Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32299291›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Phenome-Wide Analysis of Short- and Long-Run Disease Incidence Following Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Using Data From a 39-Year Period.

David Westergaard, Anna Pors Nielsen, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Søren Brunak

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Concealed Long-QT Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Gynecology Meets Big Data in the Disruptive Innovation Medical Era: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David WestergaardNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Denmark.
Anna Pors NielsenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Denmark.
Laust Hvas MortensenMethods and Analysis Statistics Denmark Copenhagen Denmark.
Henriette Svarre NielsenRecurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit Fertility Clinic Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.
Søren BrunakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It is unclear how recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) impacts disease risk and whether there is a difference in risk between women with or without a live birth before RPL (primary versus secondary RPL). We investigated the disease risk following RPL, and whether there was a difference between primary and secondary RPL. Methods and Results Using population-wide healthcare registries from Denmark, we identified a cohort of 1 370 896 ever-pregnant women aged 12 to 40 years between 1977 and 2016. Of this cohort, 10 691 (0.77%) fulfilled the criteria for RPL (50.0% primary RPL). Average follow-up was 15.8 years. Incidence rate ratios were calculated in a phenome-wide manner. Diagnoses related to assessment and diagnosis of RPL and those appearing later in life were separated using a mixture model. Primary RPL increased the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disorders, including atherosclerosis, cerebral infarction, heart failure, and pulmonary embolism, as well as systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Women with secondary RPL had no increased risk of cardiovascular disorders. However, we observed an increased risk of gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and intestinal malabsorption, as well as mental disorders and obstetric complications. Conclusions RPL is a risk factor for a spectrum of disorders, which is different for primary and secondary RPL. Screening following RPL explains some associations, but the remaining findings suggest that RPL influences or shares cause with cardiovascular disorders, autoimmune disorders, and mental disorders. Research into the pathophysiology of RPL and later diseases merits further investigation.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAbortion, HabitualAdolescentAdultChildDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesNoncommunicable DiseasesPrognosisRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsBayesian statisticsepidemiologypregnancyrecurrent pregnancy losswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID32299291
PMCPMC7428533
OpenAlexW3016951091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.