Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298870›Full record

Trial reportBrain and cognition2020

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on within- and cross-paradigm transfer following multi-session backward recall training.

Elizabeth M Byrne, Michael P Ewbank, Susan E Gathercole, Joni Holmes

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M ByrneMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK. Electronic address: emb72@cam.ac.uk.
Michael P EwbankMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK. Electronic address: m.ewbank@iesohealth.com.
Susan E GathercoleDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UK. Electronic address: seg57@cam.ac.uk.
Joni HolmesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK. Electronic address: joni.holmes@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A060_1103Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2Medical Research Council RG91365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance the efficacy and generalisation of working memory (WM) training, but there has been little systematic investigation into how coupling task-specific WM training with stimulation impacts more specifically on transfer to untrained tasks. This randomised controlled trial investigated the boundary conditions to transfer by testing firstly whether the benefits of training on backward digit recall (BDR) extend to untrained backward recall tasks and n-back tasks with different materials, and secondly which, if any, form of transfer is enhanced by tDCS. Forty-eight participants were allocated to one of three conditions: BDR training with anodal (10 min, 1 mA) or sham tDCS, or visual search training with sham tDCS, applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Transfer was assessed on within- (backward recall with digits, letters, and spatial locations) and cross-paradigm (n-back with digits and letters) transfer tests following three sessions of training and stimulation. On-task training gains were found, with transfer to other backward span but not n-back tasks. There was little evidence that tDCS enhanced on-task training or transfer. These findings indicate that training enhances paradigm-specific processes within WM, but that tDCS does not enhance these gains.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationHumansLearningMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPrefrontal CortexBrain stimulationCognitive trainingtDCSTranscranial direct current stimulationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32298870
PMCPMC7221346
OpenAlexW3011879588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.