Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298453›Full record

GuidelineJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2020

Actionable, Revised (v.3), and Amplified American Burn Association Triage Tables for Mass Casualties: A Civilian Defense Guideline.

Randy D Kearns, Amanda P Bettencourt, William L Hickerson, Tina L Palmieri, Paul D Biddinger, Colleen M Ryan, James C Jeng

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Current Status of US Children's Burn Care and Opportunities for Change.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  4. Using Implementation Science to Understand Barriers to Telemedicine Use for Burn Care During a Crisis.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Randy D KearnsCollege of Business Administration, University of New Orleans, Louisiana.
Amanda P BettencourtSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
William L HickersonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Tina L PalmieriFirefighters Burn Institute Burn Center, University of California, Davis.
Paul D BiddingerDivision of Emergency Preparedness, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Colleen M RyanHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
James C JengShriners Hospitals for Children-Boston®, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USCrozer-Keystone Health System · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Northern California · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Training to Advance Care Through Implementation Science in Cardiac And Lung Illnesses (TACTICAL)K12HL138039 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS, PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn care remains among the most complex of the time-sensitive treatment interventions in medicine today. An enormous quantity of specialized resources are required to support the critical and complex modalities needed to meet the conventional standard of care for each patient with a critical burn injury. Because of these dependencies, a sudden surge of patients with critical burn injuries requiring immediate and prolonged care following a burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) will place immense stress on healthcare system assets, including supplies, space, and an experienced workforce (staff). Therefore, careful planning to maximize the efficient mobilization and rational use of burn care resources is essential to limit morbidity and mortality following a BMCI. The U.S. burn care profession is represented by the American Burn Association (ABA). This paper has been written by clinical experts and led by the ABA to provide further clarity regarding the capacity of the American healthcare system to absorb a surge of burn-injured patients. Furthermore, this paper intends to offer responders and clinicians evidence-based tools to guide their response and care efforts to maximize burn care capabilities based on realistic assumptions when confronted with a BMCI. This effort also aims to align recommendations in part with those of the Committee on Crisis Standards of Care for the Institute of Medicine, National Academies of Sciences. Their publication guided the work in this report, identified here as "conventional, contingency, and crisis standards of care." This paper also includes an update to the burn Triage Tables- Seriously Resource-Strained Situations (v.2).

Indexed as

Mass Casualty IncidentsBurnsDisaster PlanningHumansSurge CapacityTriageUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32298453
PMCPMC7530540
OpenAlexW3010283017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.