Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298348›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Validity of the cold pressor test and pain sensitivity questionnaire via online self-administration.

Matthew H McIntyre, 23andMe Research Team, Achim Kless, Peter Hein, Mark Field, Joyce Y Tung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Feasibility and acceptability of remote administration of the cold pressor test.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automatic detection of pain using machine learning.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew H McIntyre23andMe Inc., Mountain View, California, United States of America.
23andMe Research Team
Achim KlessGrünenthal Innovation, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8301-5934
Peter HeinGrünenthal Innovation, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Mark FieldGrünenthal Innovation, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Joyce Y Tung23andMe Inc., Mountain View, California, United States of America.
Grünenthal Group (Germany) · DE23andMe (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the feasibility of complex home-based phenotyping, 1,876 research participants from the customer base of 23andMe completed an online version of a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) as well as a cold pressor test (CPT) which is used in clinical assessments of pain. Overall our online version of the PSQ performed similarly to the original pen-and-paper version. Construct validity of the PSQ total was demonstrated by internal consistency and consistent discrimination between more and less painful items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by correlation with pain sensitivity as measured by the CPT. Within the same cohort we performed a cold pressor test using a layperson description and household equipment. Comparison with published reports from controlled studies revealed similar distributions of cold pain tolerance times (i.e., time elapsed before removing the hand from the water). Of those who elected to participate in the CPT, a large majority of participants did not report issues with the test procedure or noncompliance with the instructions (97%). We confirmed a large sex difference in CPT thresholds in line with published data, such that women removed their hands from the water at a median of 54.2 seconds, with men lasting for a median time of 82.7 seconds (Kruskal-Wallis statistic, p < 0.0001), but other factors like age or current pain treatment were at most weakly associated, and inconsistently between men and women. We introduce a new paradigm for performing pain testing, called testing@home, that, in the case of cold nociception, showed comparable results to studies conducted under controlled conditions and supervision of a health care professional.

Indexed as

Pain ThresholdAdultAgedCold TemperatureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32298348
PMCPMC7162430
OpenAlexW3016318297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.