ArticlePloS one2020
Validity of the cold pressor test and pain sensitivity questionnaire via online self-administration.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptance or distraction first while suffering acute pain? Order effects on visual attention to external painful stimuli.Psychological research · 2026Trial
- Article
- Effects of Preferred Music on Pain Tolerance During an Experimental Cold Pressor Test: A Pilot Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- The descent of agamemnon and the disquietude of job: The death of agency as the spur of suicide.Psychological review · 2025Review
- TAME Pain data release: using audio signals to characterize pain.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Advancing Pain Understanding and Drug Discovery: Insights from Preclinical Models and Recent Research Findings.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Feasibility and acceptability of remote administration of the cold pressor test.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Spatial summation of pain is associated with pain expectations: Results from a home-based paradigm.PloS one · 2024Article
- Empirical comparison of deep learning models for fNIRS pain decoding.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Automatic detection of pain using machine learning.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Race, pain, and opioids among patients with chronic pain in a safety-net health system.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- More Insight on the Role of Personality Traits and Sensitivity to Experimental Pain.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Factors Associated with Pain Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Substance Use.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the feasibility of complex home-based phenotyping, 1,876 research participants from the customer base of 23andMe completed an online version of a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) as well as a cold pressor test (CPT) which is used in clinical assessments of pain. Overall our online version of the PSQ performed similarly to the original pen-and-paper version. Construct validity of the PSQ total was demonstrated by internal consistency and consistent discrimination between more and less painful items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by correlation with pain sensitivity as measured by the CPT. Within the same cohort we performed a cold pressor test using a layperson description and household equipment. Comparison with published reports from controlled studies revealed similar distributions of cold pain tolerance times (i.e., time elapsed before removing the hand from the water). Of those who elected to participate in the CPT, a large majority of participants did not report issues with the test procedure or noncompliance with the instructions (97%). We confirmed a large sex difference in CPT thresholds in line with published data, such that women removed their hands from the water at a median of 54.2 seconds, with men lasting for a median time of 82.7 seconds (Kruskal-Wallis statistic, p < 0.0001), but other factors like age or current pain treatment were at most weakly associated, and inconsistently between men and women. We introduce a new paradigm for performing pain testing, called testing@home, that, in the case of cold nociception, showed comparable results to studies conducted under controlled conditions and supervision of a health care professional.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.