Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298304›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Does deep neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopy procedures change patient, surgical, and healthcare resource outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Amit D Raval, Sohan Deshpande, Silvia Rabar, Maria Koufopoulou, Binod Neupane, Ike Iheanacho, Lori D Bash, Jay Horrow, Thomas Fuchs-Buder

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit D RavalCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, United States of America.
Sohan DeshpandeEvidence, Modeling, and Synthesis, Evidera Inc., London, England, United Kingdom.
Silvia RabarEvidence, Modeling, and Synthesis, Evidera Inc., London, England, United Kingdom.
Maria KoufopoulouEvidence, Modeling, and Synthesis, Evidera Inc., London, England, United Kingdom.
Binod NeupaneEvidence, Modeling, and Synthesis, Evidera Inc., London, England, United Kingdom.
Ike IheanachoEvidence, Modeling, and Synthesis, Evidera Inc., London, England, United Kingdom.
Lori D BashCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, United States of America.
Jay HorrowCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, United States of America.
Thomas Fuchs-BuderDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Brabois University Hospital, University de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9382-3329
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep neuromuscular blockade may facilitate the use of reduced insufflation pressure without compromising the surgical field of vision. The current evidence, which suggests improved surgical conditions compared with other levels of block during laparoscopic surgery, features significant heterogeneity. We examined surgical patient- and healthcare resource use-related outcomes of deep neuromuscular blockade compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review according to the quality standards recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of deep neuromuscular blockade and moderate neuromuscular blockade among adults undergoing laparoscopic surgeries were included. A random-effects model was used to conduct pair-wise meta-analyses.

resultsThe systematic literature review included 15 studies-only 13 were analyzable in the meta-analysis and none were judged to be at high risk of bias. Compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade, deep neuromuscular blockade was associated with improved surgical field of vision and higher vision quality scores. Also, deep neuromuscular blockade was associated with a reduction in the post-operative pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade, and there was no need for an increase in intra-abdominal pressure during the surgical procedures. There were minor savings on resource utilization, but no differences were seen in recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit or overall length of hospital stay with deep neuromuscular blockade.

conclusionsDeep neuromuscular blockade may aid the patient and physician surgical experience by improving certain patient outcomes, such as post-operative pain and improved surgical ratings, compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade. Heterogeneity in the pooled estimates suggests the need for better designed randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNeuromuscular BlockadeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32298304
PMCPMC7161978
OpenAlexW3017150157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.