ArticlePloS one2020
Treatment of mice with a ligand binding blocking anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody improves healing after myocardial infarction.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment with saturating dose of conventional anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody well tolerated in pig acute myocardial infarction model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- CTLA-4-Ig therapy preserves cardiac function following myocardial infarction with reperfusion.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Repair of the Infarcted Heart: Cellular Effectors, Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Circulation research · 2024Review
- Transcriptomic Establishment of Pig Macrophage Polarization Signatures.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Post-myocardial infarction fibrosis: Pathophysiology, examination, and intervention.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Mechanisms and strategies for a therapeutic cardiac immune response.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both conventional and regulatory CD4+ T-cells rely on costimulatory signals mediated by cell surface receptors including CD28 for full activation. We showed previously that stimulation of CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells by superagonistic anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) improves myocardial healing after experimental myocardial infarction (MI). However, the effect of ligand binding blocking anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies has not yet been tested in this context. We hypothesize that ligand blocking anti-CD28 mAb treatment might favorably impact on healing after MI by limiting the activation of conventional CD4+ T-cells. Therefore, we studied the therapeutic effect of the recently characterized mAb E18 which blocks ligand binding to CD28 in a mouse permanent coronary ligation model. E18 or an irrelevant control mAb was applied once on day two after myocardial infarction to wildtype mice. Echocardiography was performed on day 7 after MI. E18 treatment improved the survival and reduced the incidence of left ventricular ruptures after experimental myocardial infarction. Accordingly, although we found no difference in infarct size, there was significantly less left ventricular dilation after E18 treatment in surviving animals as determined by echocardiography at day 7 after MI. In sham operated control mice neither antibody had an impact on body weight, survival, and echocardiographic parameters. Mechanistically, compared to control immunoglobulin, E18 treatment reduced the number of CD4+ T-cells and monocytes/macrophages within the infarct and periinfarct zone on day 5. This was accompanied by an upregulation of arginase which is a marker for alternatively differentiated macrophages. The data indicate that CD28-dependent costimulation of CD4+ T-cells impairs myocardial healing and anti-CD28 antibody treatment constitutes a potentially clinically translatable approach to improve the outcome early after MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.