Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298162›Full record

ReviewAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting2020

Making Checkpoint Inhibitors Part of Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancers: The Time Is Now.

Mark G Kris, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Tiana Kordbacheh, Jamie Chaft, Jia Luo, Anne Tsao, Stephen Swisher

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark G KrisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Corinne Faivre-FinnThe University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Tiana KordbachehThe University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jamie ChaftMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Jia LuoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Anne TsaoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Stephen SwisherThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cornell University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Manchester · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PACIFIC trial of durvalumab administered for 1 year to patients with stage III lung cancers has set a new standard of care. PACIFIC established the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for individuals with inoperable and unresectable locally advanced lung cancers that achieve disease control from concurrent chemoradiation. For patients with resectable and operable disease, ICIs administered before surgery, either alone (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, and NEOSTAR) or in combination with chemotherapy (Columbia/MGH and NADIM), have yielded high rates of major pathologic response in resection specimens, an outcome measure that correlates with improved progression-free survival and overall survival. These results have brought forth the dilemma of how to choose the optimal local therapy-either definitive concurrent chemoradiation or surgery-to use with an ICI for patients with stage III lung cancers that are both operable and resectable. Here, we review the data that support the use of each local therapy. Recent successes have also raised the possibility that using ICIs in patients with earlier stages of lung cancer will enhance curability. Randomized trials are underway; however, until they read out, physicians must choose between local and systemic therapies on the basis of the information we have today. Research demonstrates that using surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and ICIs improve all efficacy outcomes and curability. All modalities should be considered in every patient with locally advanced lung cancer. It is imperative that a multimodality discussion that includes the possible addition of ICIs takes place to choose the best modality and sequence of therapies for each patient.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHumansLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID32298162
PMCPMC7357690
OpenAlexW3016294135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.