Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297947›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Association of Maternal History of Neonatal Death With Subsequent Neonatal Death in India.

Mudit Kapoor, Rockli Kim, Tanushree Sahoo, Ambuj Roy, Shamika Ravi, A K Shiva Kumar, Ramesh Agarwal, S V Subramanian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mudit KapoorEconomics and Planning Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rockli KimDivision of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Tanushree SahooDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ambuj RoyDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shamika RaviBrookings India, New Delhi, India.
A K Shiva KumarDevelopment Economist and Policy Adviser, New Delhi, India.
Ramesh AgarwalDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
S V SubramanianHarvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INHarvard University · USIndian Statistical Institute · INKorea University · KROffice of the Principal Scientific Adviser · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Among the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce the neonatal mortality rate to 12 per 1000 live births by 2030. Identifying high-risk pregnancies can help achieve this target in low-resource countries, such as India, which accounts for one-fourth of global neonatal deaths. Objective: To analyze the association of maternal history of neonatal death with subsequent neonatal mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included a nationally representative sample of singleton live births from multiparous women. Data were obtained from the 2016 National Family Health Survey in India. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to January 2020. Exposures: Maternal history of neonatal death and a comprehensive set of covariates, including socioeconomic environment, maternal anthropometry, and pregnancy care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Subsequent neonatal mortality. Population-attributable risk associated with history of neonatal death was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The overall study population consisted of 127 336 singleton live births from multiparous women aged 15 to 49 (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [5.2] years) years when the survey was undertaken. In our analytic sample, 11 101 (8.7%) mothers had a history of neonatal death, and 506 of 2224 total neonatal deaths (22.8%) were attributed to women with history of neonatal death. The prevalence of history of neonatal death differed by selected covariates and across states or union territories. Maternal history of neonatal death was associated with significantly higher odds of neonatal mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.96-2.55), and this remained consistent across different subgroups. The population-attributable risk associated with maternal history of neonatal death was 11.8%. Stronger associations were found for maternal history of multiple neonatal deaths (adjusted odds ratio, 3.50; 95% CI, 2.78-4.41) and in respect to the risk of mortality in early neonatal period (ie, 0-2 completed days) (adjusted odds ratio, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.09-2.86). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that maternal history of neonatal death is a potentially useful risk factor to identify women and neonates who may need extended and enhanced pregnancy care.

Indexed as

ParityPerinatal DeathPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32297947
PMCPMC7163408
OpenAlexW3017110961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.