Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297542›Full record

ReviewPlatelets2020

Mouse laser injury models: variations on a theme.

Timothy J Stalker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Platelets, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fibrin as a Versatile Fibrous Biopolymer.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ACS sensors · 2021
    Article
  19. Visualizing thrombosis to improve thrombus resolution.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Timothy J StalkerDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Translating Mechanistic Insights into Intrinsic Xase FunctionP01HL139420 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Sriram Krishnaswamy · 2018 to 2026
$22.4M
Thrombosis Models CoreP01HL120846 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABRAMS, CHARLES S. · 2014 to 2018
$12.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL120846NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL139420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A confluence of technological advances in genetic manipulation and molecular-based fluorescence imaging has led to the widespread adoption of laser injury models to study hemostasis and thrombosis in mice. In all animal models of hemostasis and thrombosis, detailing the nature of experimentally induced vascular injury is paramount in enabling appropriate interpretation of experimental results. A careful appraisal of the literature shows that direct laser-induced injury can result in variable degrees of vascular damage. This review will compare and contrast models of laser injury utilized in the field, with an emphasis on the mechanism and extent of injury, the use of laser injury in different vascular beds and the molecular mechanisms regulating the response to injury. All of these topics will be discussed in the context of how distinct applications of laser injury models may be viewed as representing thrombosis and/or hemostasis.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalLaser TherapyMiceAnimalsEndothelial CellsFemoral ArteryHemostasisHumansIntravital MicroscopyPlatelet ActivationSaphenous VeinThrombosisThromboxane A2Vascular System InjuriesThromboxane A2Hemostasisintravital microscopylaser injurythrombosis

Identifiers

PMID32297542
PMCPMC7295038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.