ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2020
Can a pragmatic responsive feeding scale be developed and applied globally?
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responsive Mealtime Matters: Feeding Autonomy and Varied Settings Were Associated With Problem-Solving Skills of Ethiopian Children Aged 6-23 Months.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- [Preliminary development and evaluation of a scale to assess caregivers' responsive feeding behaviors for children aged 0-24 months].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- Factors associated with caregiver responsive and non-responsive feeding styles in Clark County, Nevada.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Child diet and mother-child interactions mediate intervention effects on child growth and development.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Article
- Population-based approaches for monitoring the nurturing care environment for early childhood development: A scoping review.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Article
- Responsive Feeding Recommendations: Harmonizing Integration into Dietary Guidelines for Infants and Young Children.Current developments in nutrition · 2021Article
- Can a pragmatic responsive feeding scale be developed and applied globally?Maternal & child nutrition · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Responsive feeding (RF) has been recognized as necessary to prevent all forms of malnutrition including stunting and childhood obesity. Specific RF guidelines have been developed, but it is unclear how RF behaviours can be monitored systematically. Therefore, developing valid and reliable abbreviated and pragmatic RF scales is an important global priority. This is challenging, as RF is a construct with multiple dimensions including recognizing and responding to hunger and satiety cues, providing a nurturing environment during feeding episodes, and understanding how feeding needs evolve as a function of the developmental stage of the young child. Further, RF is embedded within the responsive parenting framework that in addition to RF includes sleep, soothing and play routines and the interconnections between them. A recent pioneer study conducted in a rural area of Cambodia validated an 8-item RF scale through direct feeding observations of 6- to 23-month-old infants at home, as part of two cross-sectional surveys conducted before and after a complementary feeding intervention. It is important for similar research to be conducted elsewhere to find out if it is possible or not to develop a core RF scale that is valid and reliable and that has adequate specificity and sensitivity for application in community studies and population surveys globally. As highlighted in this article, different definitions of RF have been used in the field; thus, it is important to reach consensus on a single definition to help move this research area forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.