Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297404›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2020

Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging.

Kun-Han Lu, Jiayue Cao, Robert Phillips, Terry L Powley, Zhongming Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surface mapping of gastric motor functions using MRI: a comparative study between humans and rats.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization of neuromuscular transmission and projections of muscle motor neurons in the rat stomach.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun-Han LuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-8515
Jiayue CaoBiomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert PhillipsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Terry L PowleyPurdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6689-7058
Zhongming LiuBiomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-4204
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Mapping Stomach Autonomic Circuitry and Function for Neuromodulation of Gastric DisordersOT2OD023847 · OD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI POWLEY, TERRY L. · 2016 to 2021
$17.6M
HYPOTHALAMIC CONTROL OF BODY WEIGHT AND FEEDINGR01DK027627 · NIDDK · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI POWLEY, TERRY L. · 1986 to 2021
$6.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK027627NIH HHS OT2 OD023847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized.

methodsIn anesthetized rats (N = 3), we applied monophasic electrical stimuli to the left cervical vagus and recorded compound nerve action potential (CNAP) as a measure of nerve response. We evaluated to what extent afferent or efferent pathway could be selectively activated by monophasic VNS. In a different group of rats (N = 13), we fed each rat a gadolinium-labeled meal and scanned the rat stomach with oral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while the rat was anesthetized. We evaluated the antral and pyloric motility as a function of pulse amplitude (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mA), width (0.13, 0.25, 0.5 ms), frequency (5, 10 Hz), and polarity of VNS. KEY

resultsMonophasic VNS activated efferent and afferent pathways with about 67% and 82% selectivity, respectively. Primarily afferent VNS increased antral motility across a wide range of parameters. Primarily efferent VNS induced a significant decrease in antral motility as the stimulus intensity increased (R = -.93, P < .05 for 5 Hz, R = -.85, P < .05 for 10 Hz). The VNS with either polarity tended to promote pyloric motility to a greater extent given increasing stimulus intensity. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Monophasic VNS biased toward the afferent pathway is potentially more effective for facilitating occlusive contractions than that biased toward the efferent pathway.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MotilityAction PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsDuodenumEfferent PathwaysMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePyloric AntrumPylorusRats, Sprague-DawleyVagus NerveVagus Nerve Stimulationgastric motilitymagnetic resonance imagingratvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32297404
PMCPMC7872206
OpenAlexW3016662822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.