Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297326›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2020

MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study.

R Detering, S E van Oostendorp, V M Meyer, S van Dieren, A C R K Bos, J W T Dekker, O Reerink, J H T M van Waesberghe, C A M Marijnen, L M G Moons and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04103372 (Pre-therapeutic MRI Assessment of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer and Significant Rectal Polyps to Avoid Major Resectional Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04103372 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pre-therapeutic MRI Assessment of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer and Significant Rectal Polyps to Avoid Major Resectional Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2024 to 2031Enrolled200ConditionsRectal Cancer, Colo-rectal CancerArmsMRI scan, Radiologist training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging in differentiating T0-T1 from T2 rectal tumors.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

R DeteringDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-7116
S E van OostendorpDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-7956
V M MeyerDepartment of Surgery, Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-7973
S van DierenClinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3084-0495
A C R K BosDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-7791
J W T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-468X
O ReerinkDepartment of Radiotherapy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
J H T M van WaesbergheDepartment of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C A M MarijnenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0189-5953
L M G MoonsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-9954
R G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-5090
R HompesDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-8950
H L van WestreenenDepartment of Surgery, Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0600-9244
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-3310
J B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-8000
Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group*
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLViaa Christian University of Applied Sciences · NLIsala · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate MRI-based staging of early rectal cancers is essential for decision-making in an era of organ-conserving treatment approaches. The aim of this population-based study was to determine the accuracy of routine daily MRI staging of early rectal cancer, whether or not combined with endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS).

methodsPatients with cT1-2 rectal cancer who underwent local excision or total mesorectal excision (TME) without downsizing (chemo)radiotherapy between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 were selected from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. The accuracy of imaging was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value.

resultsOf 7382 registered patients with cT1-2 rectal cancer, 5539 were included (5288 MRI alone, 251 MRI and ERUS; 1059 cT1 and 4480 cT2). Among patients with pT1 tumours, 54·7 per cent (792 of 1448) were overstaged by MRI alone, and 31·0 per cent (36 of 116) by MRI and ERUS. Understaging of pT2 disease occurred in 8·2 per cent (197 of 2388) and 27·9 per cent (31 of 111) respectively. MRI alone overstaged pN0 in 17·3 per cent (570 of 3303) and the PPV for assignment of cN0 category was 76·3 per cent (2733 of 3583). Of 834 patients with pT1 N0 disease, potentially suitable for local excision, tumours in 253 patients (30·3 per cent) were staged correctly as cT1 N0, whereas 484 (58·0 per cent) and 97 (11·6 per cent) were overstaged as cT2 N0 and cT1-2 N1 respectively.

conclusionThis Dutch population-based analysis of patients who underwent local excision or TME surgery for cT1-2 rectal cancer based on preoperative MRI staging revealed substantial overstaging, indicating the weaknesses of MRI and missed opportunities for organ preservation strategies.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingAgedClinical AuditEndosonographyFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleNetherlandsPredictive Value of TestsRectal NeoplasmsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32297326
PMCPMC7496930
OpenAlexW3016829871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.