Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297285›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2020

Postherpetic Neuralgia: Current Evidence on the Topical Film-Forming Spray with Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and a Review of Available Treatment Strategies.

Anh L Ngo, Ivan Urits, Melis Yilmaz, Luc Fortier, Anthony Anya, Jae Hak Oh, Amnon A Berger, Hisham Kassem, Manuel G Sanchez, Alan D Kaye and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Anh L NgoHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ivan UritsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. ivanurits@gmail.com.
Melis YilmazHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Luc FortierGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Anthony AnyaGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Jae Hak OhGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Amnon A BergerDepartment of Pain Medicine, Pain Specialty Group, Newington, NH, USA.
Hisham KassemDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Manuel G SanchezDepartment of Pain Medicine, Pain Specialty Group, Newington, NH, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Richard D UrmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Edwin W HerronDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Elyse M CornettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Omar ViswanathValley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Children's Specialty Group · USGeorgetown University · USLouisiana State University in Shreveport · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis is a comprehensive review of the literature about the use of bupivacaine hydrochloride for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). It briefly reviews the background, biology, diagnosis and conventional treatment for PHN, and then introduces and compares the recent evidence for the use of topical bupivacaine. RECENT

findingsPHN is defined by pain lasting 90 days or more after the initial presentation of herpes zoster ("Shingles", HZ) rash and is the most common complication of this disease. A product of re-activation of the Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV), HZ is diagnosed more than 1 million times annually in the United States. Approximately 20% of patients with HZ will experience PHN and will continue to suffer intermittent neuropathic symptoms, including itching and pain, that is sharp, stabbing, throbbing or burning, with the pain localized to the site of their original rash. This long-lasting pain compares with the severity of long-standing rheumatics and osteo-arthritis and is accompanied by severe allodynia causing significant suffering, and a financial burden that is manifested in both healthcare costs and loss of quality-adjusted life years. Prevention of PHN may be achieved with the Zoster vaccine, although there is still a large segment of unvaccinated population. Moreover, the Zoster vaccine is not always effective for prevention. Current treatment includes medical (systemic tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants and opioids, topical lidocaine and capsaicin) and interventional (subcutaneous Botox injections, nerve blocks and nerve stimulation) therapies. These therapies are not always effective, and each carries their own profile of side effects and risks. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with PHN are refractory to management. Recent evidence is emerging to support the use of topical local anesthetics for the treatment of PHN. Two small studies recently found topical lidocaine spray to be effective in treating paroxysmal pain attacks associated with PHN. Bupivacaine is a longer-lasting local anesthetic, and a film-forming formulation allows easy and durable application to the affected skin. Recent studies show that topical film-forming bupivacaine is safe and as effective as lidocaine for the treatment of PHN. PHN is an important though common complication of HZ and can cause long-lasting pain and disability. Current treatment for PNH is limited by efficacy and safety profiles of individual therapies. Recent evidence points to topical local anesthetics as an effective and safe alternative to conventional therapy. Film-forming bupivacaine may offer a durable and safe option for this otherwise difficult to treat syndrome.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidBupivacaineChronic PainHealth Care CostsHerpes ZosterHumansNeuralgia, PostherpeticAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidBupivacaineBupivacaineFilm-forming systemsHerpes zosterLidocaineLocal anestheticsPost-herpetic neuralgiaShinglesVZV

Identifiers

PMID32297285
PMCPMC7467465
OpenAlexW3016624187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.