Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297220›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020

PrEP Product Acceptability and Dual Process Decision-Making Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

José A Bauermeister, Julie S Downs, Douglas S Krakower

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José A BauermeisterSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Room 222L, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. bjose@upenn.edu.
Julie S DownsDepartment of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Douglas S KrakowerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID S METZGER · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
The UNC/Emory Center for Innovative Technology (iTech) across the prevention and care continuumU19HD089881 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HIGHTOW-WEIDMAN, LISA B, SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2016 to 2022
$35.8M
Project-002U19AI120249 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L., ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
EHR-Based Prediction Models to Improve PrEP Use in Community Health CentersR34MH122291 · NIMH · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT, MARCUS, JULIA L. · 2020 to 2022
$743k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI120249NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD089881NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH122291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAdvances in short- and long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) technologies have incentivized the need to understand how individuals make trade-offs and competing decisions regarding PrEP modalities. The purpose of this review was to examine how researchers have conceptualized and measured attributes that are either intuitive and emotional (System 1) or deliberative and cognitive (System 2) in conjoint analysis or discrete choice experiments focused on diverse PrEP technologies among men who have sex with men (MSM). RECENT

findingsAcross the 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, 5 included oral PrEP, 3 included topical rectal microbicides, 4 included PrEP injectables, and 1 study focused on an HIV prevention vaccine. Studies have not used uniform metrics, making comparisons difficult. Researchers measured attributes linked to System 2 processing (e.g., cost, efficacy), yet none examined System 1 processing. There is not one product or attribute preferable to all groups. Prevention products will need to be developed and promoted to reflect that diversity. Given that PrEP technologies have been solely informed by System 2 attributes, efforts to integrate System 1 attributes into ongoing and future PrEP choice experiments are pivotal to advance PrEP acceptability research and interventions to support their implementation.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAnti-HIV AgentsAcceptabilityConjoint analysisDecision-makingDiscrete choiceDual process

Identifiers

PMID32297220
PMCPMC7260091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.