ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2020
Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Power-Law and Viscoelastic Hemolysis Models in the FDA Nozzle Benchmark Geometry.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Article
- From Early Models to Emerging Trends: The Evolution of Computational Hemolysis Prediction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Examining the universality of the hemolysis power law model from simulations of the FDA nozzle using calibrated model coefficients.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Flow simulation-based particle swarm optimization for developing improved hemolysis models.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Influence of Inlet Boundary Conditions on the Prediction of Flow Field and Hemolysis in Blood Pumps Using Large-Eddy Simulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Computational Prediction of Thrombosis in Food and Drug Administration's Benchmark Nozzle.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Equivalent Scalar Stress Formulation Taking into Account Non-Resolved Turbulent Scales.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeModeling of hemolysis due to fluid stresses faces significant methodological challenges, particularly in geometries with turbulence or complex flow patterns. It is currently unclear how existing phenomenological blood-damage models based on laminar viscous stresses can be implemented into turbulent computational fluid dynamics simulations. The aim of this work is to generalize the existing laminar models to turbulent flows based on first principles, and validate this generalization with existing experimental data.
methodsA novel analytical and numerical framework for the simulation of flow-induced hemolysis based on the intermittency-corrected turbulent viscous shear stress (ICTVSS) is introduced. The proposed large-eddy simulation framework is able to seamlessly transition from laminar to turbulent conditions in a single flow domain by linking laminar shear stresses to dissipation of mechanical energy, accounting for intermittency in turbulent dissipation, and relying on existing power-law hemolysis models. Simulations are run to reproduce previously published hemolysis data with bovine blood in a benchmark geometry. Two sets of experimental data are relied upon to tune power-law parameters and justify that tuning. The first presents hemolysis measurements in a simple laminar flow, and the second is hemolysis in turbulent flow through the FDA benchmark nozzle. Validation is performed by simulation of blood injected into a turbulent jet of phosphate-buffered saline, with modifications made to account for the local concentration of blood.
resultsHemolysis predictions are found to be very sensitive to power-law parameters in the turbulent case, though a set of parameters is presented that both matches the turbulent data and is well-justified by the laminar data. The model is shown to be able to predict the general behavior of hemolysis in a second turbulent case. Results suggest that wall shear may play a dominant role in most cases.
conclusionThe ICTVSS framework of generalizing laminar power-law models to turbulent flows shows promise, but would benefit from further numerical validation and carefully designed experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.