Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297154›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2020

Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.

Nicolas Tobin, Keefe B Manning

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicolas TobinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Keefe B ManningDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. kbm10@psu.edu.

Funding

A Structured Approach to the Design of Minimally Traumatic Blood PumpsR01HL136369 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CYSYK, JOSHUA P, MANNING, KEEFE B · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeModeling of hemolysis due to fluid stresses faces significant methodological challenges, particularly in geometries with turbulence or complex flow patterns. It is currently unclear how existing phenomenological blood-damage models based on laminar viscous stresses can be implemented into turbulent computational fluid dynamics simulations. The aim of this work is to generalize the existing laminar models to turbulent flows based on first principles, and validate this generalization with existing experimental data.

methodsA novel analytical and numerical framework for the simulation of flow-induced hemolysis based on the intermittency-corrected turbulent viscous shear stress (ICTVSS) is introduced. The proposed large-eddy simulation framework is able to seamlessly transition from laminar to turbulent conditions in a single flow domain by linking laminar shear stresses to dissipation of mechanical energy, accounting for intermittency in turbulent dissipation, and relying on existing power-law hemolysis models. Simulations are run to reproduce previously published hemolysis data with bovine blood in a benchmark geometry. Two sets of experimental data are relied upon to tune power-law parameters and justify that tuning. The first presents hemolysis measurements in a simple laminar flow, and the second is hemolysis in turbulent flow through the FDA benchmark nozzle. Validation is performed by simulation of blood injected into a turbulent jet of phosphate-buffered saline, with modifications made to account for the local concentration of blood.

resultsHemolysis predictions are found to be very sensitive to power-law parameters in the turbulent case, though a set of parameters is presented that both matches the turbulent data and is well-justified by the laminar data. The model is shown to be able to predict the general behavior of hemolysis in a second turbulent case. Results suggest that wall shear may play a dominant role in most cases.

conclusionThe ICTVSS framework of generalizing laminar power-law models to turbulent flows shows promise, but would benefit from further numerical validation and carefully designed experiments.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDevice ApprovalHemodynamicsHemolysisModels, TheoreticalUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBlood Flow VelocityBlood ViscosityHeart-Assist DevicesMaterials TestingNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedProsthesis DesignReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStress, MechanicalDissipationHemolysisLarge-eddy simulationSubgrid-scale modeling

Identifiers

PMID32297154
PMCPMC7230024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.