Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32297129›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

Automated mammographic mass detection using deformable convolution and multiscale features.

Junchuan Peng, Changyu Bao, Chuting Hu, Xianming Wang, Wenjing Jian, Weixiang Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junchuan PengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Changyu BaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Chuting HuDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Xianming WangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China. jrwk01@163.com.
Wenjing JianDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Weixiang LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. wxliu@szu.edu.cn.
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems that can precisely identify lesions from mammography images would be useful for clinicians. Considering the morphological variation in breast cancer, it is necessary to extract robust features from the mammogram. Here, we propose a mass detection CAD system that is based on Faster R-CNN. First, we applied a novel convolution network in the backbone of Faster R-CNN, namely deformable convolution network (DCN), which improves the detection of lesions with varying shapes and sizes. Second, the original Faster R-CNN uses the output of the last layer of the backbone as a single-scale feature map. To facilitate the detection of small lesions, we used a multiscale feature pyramid network of multiple cross-scale connections between the different output layers of the backbone, called the neural architecture search-feature pyramid network (NAS-FPN). Thus, we were able to integrate the best features into the model. We then evaluated our method by using the datasets the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of Digital Database for Screening Mammography (CBIS-DDSM) and INbreast, respectively. Our method yielded a true positive rate of 0.9345 at 2.2805 false positive per image on CBIS-DDSM and a true positive rate of 0.9554 at 0.3829 false positive per image on INbreast. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectronic Data ProcessingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyDeformable convolution networkFaster R-CNNMammographyMass detectionMultiscale features

Identifiers

PMID32297129
OpenAlexW3016496772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.