ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Automated mammographic mass detection using deformable convolution and multiscale features.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning empowered breast cancer diagnosis: Advancements in detection and classification.PloS one · 2024Article
- Automatic deep learning method for detection and classification of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- The Role of Deep Learning in Advancing Breast Cancer Detection Using Different Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Fast four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction using deformable convolutional networks.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Detection of Cervical Cancer Cells in Whole Slide Images Using Deformable and Global Context Aware Faster RCNN-FPN.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Designing computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems that can precisely identify lesions from mammography images would be useful for clinicians. Considering the morphological variation in breast cancer, it is necessary to extract robust features from the mammogram. Here, we propose a mass detection CAD system that is based on Faster R-CNN. First, we applied a novel convolution network in the backbone of Faster R-CNN, namely deformable convolution network (DCN), which improves the detection of lesions with varying shapes and sizes. Second, the original Faster R-CNN uses the output of the last layer of the backbone as a single-scale feature map. To facilitate the detection of small lesions, we used a multiscale feature pyramid network of multiple cross-scale connections between the different output layers of the backbone, called the neural architecture search-feature pyramid network (NAS-FPN). Thus, we were able to integrate the best features into the model. We then evaluated our method by using the datasets the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of Digital Database for Screening Mammography (CBIS-DDSM) and INbreast, respectively. Our method yielded a true positive rate of 0.9345 at 2.2805 false positive per image on CBIS-DDSM and a true positive rate of 0.9554 at 0.3829 false positive per image on INbreast. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.