ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using CT characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2023Pooled it
- Anteroposterior diameter of the pancreas in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and acute pancreatitis on MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- IgG4-related disease in gastroenterology: from pathogenesis to clinical management and long-term outcomes.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Coexisting autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Diagnostic challenges and case insights.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- The bulging pancreas: unmasking causes beyond autoimmunity-an imaging-based approach to diffuse pancreatic enlargement.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Imaging of Pancreatic and Biliary Involvement in IgG4-Related Disease: Key Imaging Features, Diagnostic Criteria and Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multicenter Validation Study of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis 2020 in Japan.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Observational
- Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mass-forming type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis with upstream dilatation of the main pancreatic duct dilatation: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and its Mimicking Lesions.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- Pancreatic infiltrative malignancy masquerading as autoimmune pancreatitis: Case report, review of radiological criteria, and literature.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Radiology domain in the diagnosis of IgG4-RD according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A multidisciplinary approach is essential for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
- A multidomain fusion model of radiomics and deep learning to discriminate between PDAC and AIP based onJapanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Immunoglobulin G4-related Sclerosing Cholangitis: Past, Present, and Future.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours misdiagnosed as autoimmune pancreatitis: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2020.Journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Biopsy diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: Does it bring a conclusion or confusion?DEN open · 2022Review
- IgG4-related diseases of the digestive tract.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Consensus Diagnosis Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been published internationally for the diagnosis of AIP. However, since the revisions in 2006 and 2011, the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis 2018 have been published. The criteria were revised based the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria 2011, and included descriptions of characteristic imaging findings such as (1) pancreatic enlargement and (2) distinctive narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. In addition, pancreatic duct images obtained by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as well as conventional endoscopic retrograde pancreatography were newly adopted. The guideline explains some characteristic imaging findings, but does not contain descriptions of the imaging methods, such as detailed imaging parameters and optimal timings of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. It is a matter of concern that imaging methods can vary from hospital to hospital. Although other characteristic findings have been reported, these findings were not described in the guideline. The present paper describes the imaging methods for obtaining optimal images and the characteristic imaging findings with the aim of standardizing image quality and improving diagnostic accuracy when radiologists diagnose AIP in actual clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.