Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296968›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

Failure analysis of infection persistence after septic revision surgery: a checklist algorithm for risk factors in knee and hip arthroplasty.

Sofia Kilgus, Daniel Karczewski, Cindy Passkönig, Tobias Winkler, Doruk Akgün, Carsten Perka, Michael Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofia Kilgus *Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel Karczewski *Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. daniel.karczewski@charite.de.
Cindy PasskönigCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias WinklerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Doruk AkgünCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten PerkaCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Michael MüllerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral studies describe risk factors for primary periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and general treatment outcome factors like microbe spectrum or patient-specific risk factors. However, these general and patient dependent findings cannot solely explain all cases of infection persistence after a prior septic revision. This study analyzes possible specific and patient independent reasons for failure after revisions for PJI in knee and hip arthroplasty.

methodsIn a prospective analysis all patients were included that were treated: (1) at our department, (2) with a two-stage exchange, (3) between 2013 and 2017, (4) due to an infection persistence after a previous revision for PJI. Possible reasons for infection persistence were identified using a checklist algorithm, based on international guidelines.

results70 patients with infection persistence could be included (44 knee joints, 26 hip joints). The average age was 71 years, the CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index) 2.8 and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score 2.7. In 85% at least one possible reason for patient independent infection persistence could be identified analyzing the previous infection therapy: (1) 50% inadequate therapy concept (n = 35), (2) 33% inadequate surgical debridement (n = 23), (3) 30% inadequate antimicrobial therapy (n = 21), (4) 13% missed external bacterial primary focus (n = 9). After the individual failure analysis, all 70 patients were treated with a two-stage exchange in our department and in 94.9% infection freedom could be achieved (34.3 ± 10.9 months follow-up).

conclusionsIn the majority of failed revisions with subsequent infection persistence at least one possible patient independent failure cause could be identified. The entire previous therapy should be critically reviewed following failing revisions to optimize the outcome of septic revisions. By using a checklist algorithm, high rates of infection freedom were achieved.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChecklistHip JointHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplastyChecklistComplicationsFailurePeriprosthetic joint infectionRecurrent infection

Identifiers

PMID32296968
OpenAlexW3017087806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.