Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296934›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Diagnostic approach in hepatic lymphoma: radiological imaging findings and literature review.

Davide Ippolito, Marco Porta, Cesare Maino, Anna Pecorelli, Maria Ragusi, Teresa Giandola, Giulia Querques, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A 54-year-old man with multiple liver lesions.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Unusual liver tumors: spectrum of imaging findings with pathologic correlationDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Davide IppolitoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Marco PortaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Cesare MainoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Anna PecorelliDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy. pecorelli.anna@gmail.com.
Maria RagusiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Teresa GiandolaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Giulia QuerquesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Cammillo Talei FranzesiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Sandro SironiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImaging manifestations of hepatic lymphoma, both primary (PHL) and secondary (SHL), are extremely variable and non-specific, but some features are useful diagnostic clues in an appropriate clinical setting. Through a PubMed search, we found several published reviews focused on PHL and SHL diagnosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, few of them encompass a comprehensive analysis of all the diagnostic tools and relative radiological findings. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the radiological features of both PHL and SHL, by critically analyzing the available literature. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn extensive review of published literature along with a description of personal case series of both PHL and SHL has been conducted.

resultsSHL can be easily diagnosed with imaging techniques, as it is usually associated with node disease. On the contrary the diagnosis can be a challenge in PHL, often mimicking HCC or liver metastasis of adenocarcinoma. In this context, multiparametric MRI plays a fundamental role in the differential diagnosis. Both for PHL and SHL, liver involvement presents as solitary or multiple lesions or as diffuse infiltrative disease.

conclusionPHL and SHL may be correctly characterized using different radiological techniques. Both CT and MRI have showed a good correlation with histology, as they permit to distinguish between lymphomatous tissue, and necrotic and fibrotic areas.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphomaMaleNeoplasm StagingComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingPrimary hepatic lymphomaSecondary hepatic lymphomaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32296934
PMCPMC11804346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.