Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296933›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Agne Sipaviciute, Ernestas Sileika, Arvydas Burneckis, Audrius Dulskas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05671809 (Effects of Different Treatment for Anorectal Function of Patients With Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05671809 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Different Treatment for Anorectal Function of Patients With Rectal Cancer: a Study Protocol for a Prospective, Observational, Controlled, Multicentre Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled402ConditionsRectal CancerArmsNCRT with surgery, or NCT with surgery, or surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-gastrointestinal symptom burden following colorectal cancer treatment-a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Dynamics in distress and quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for rectal cancer-A prospective nationwide study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Latent class symptom profiles of colorectal cancer survivors with cancer-related cognitive impairment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agne SipaviciuteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ernestas SileikaDepartment of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Institute, 1 Santariskiu Str., LT-08406, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Arvydas BurneckisDepartment of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Institute, 1 Santariskiu Str., LT-08406, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Audrius DulskasDepartment of Abdominal and General Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 1 Santariskiu Str., LT-08406, Vilnius, Lithuania. audrius.dulskas@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough the multimodal cancer treatment techniques have greatly improved over the years, irradiation-induced late gastrointestinal toxicity remains a great concern as it may highly affect the quality of life of a patient. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of late gastrointestinal toxicities.

methodsElectronic databases of Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and PubMed were searched until September 2019. We used the following keywords: radiotherapy, radiation therapy, irradiation, rectal cancer, gastrointestinal toxicity, adverse effects, late effects, pelvic radiation and pelvic radiation disease.

resultsNine studies were included into this review out of 4785 that were preidentified as potentially relevant. Overall prevalence of severe (Grade 3 or higher) late irradiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicities was up to 19%. Most frequent toxicities of any grade were reported to be diarrhoea (up to 35%), faecal incontinence (22%), incontinence to gas (71%), rectal bleeding (9%), rectal pain (13%) and obstruction (7.4%). Preoperative treatment approaches and more advance radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) turn out to result in lower late gastrointestinal toxicity rates.

conclusionAfter great improvements in rectal cancer treatment, late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy is experienced less frequent and less severe; however, it remains a great concern associated with worse quality of life.

Indexed as

DiarrheaFecal IncontinenceGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIntestinal ObstructionPainRadiotherapyRectal DiseasesRectal NeoplasmsTime FactorsLate gastrointestinal toxicityQuality of lifeRadiotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.