ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Multicenter Cryptococcal Antigen Screening of HIV-Infected Patients in Iran.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia in HIV-infected patients: a review of recent studies.Chinese medical journal · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis and targeted preemptive antifungal treatment are crucial in reducing cryptococcal meningitis (CM)-related mortality in individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The present study was performed to determine cryptococcal antigenemia and outcomes among HIV-infected patients in Iran. This multicenter prospective study was conducted between October 2016 and December 2018. For the purpose of the study, blood samples were randomly collected from 177 profoundly immunosuppressed (CD4+ counts < 200 cells/µL) HIV-positive individuals in six major cities of Iran. The patients were antiretroviral therapy-naive or had received inadequate medication. The stored sera were screened for cryptococcal antigen (CrAg), using point-of-care lateral flow assay (IMMY® diagnostics, Norman, OK, US). Overall, out of the 174 asymptomatic patients, 3 (1.72%) cases were CrAg-positive using the LFA in serum. Accordingly, the prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia was 7.14%, 0%, and 1.2% in the patients with the CD4+ counts of < 50, 50-100, and 100-200 cells/μL, respectively. The median age of the patients with antigenemia was 36 years (age range 8-55 years). The median CD4+ count of the cohort was 98 cells/μL (range 14-200 cells/μL). Routine screening of Iranian HIV-infected patients with CD4+ count of < 50 cells/µL before initiating antiretroviral therapy is justified. It is suggested to conduct more inclusive research throughout the whole country on more patients to recommend screening cryptococcal antigen strongly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32296917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.