ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020
Use of over-the-counter laxatives by community-dwelling adults to treat and prevent constipation: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Dietary Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- New Insights into a Conceptual Bionic Colonic Bioreactor: A Model, 'Probiotics in Human Colon', Showing How Probiotics Alleviate Constipation from a Bioprocess Engineering Perspective.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Constipation Symptoms among Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Digestion · 2024Article
- Association of laxatives use with incident dementia and modifying effect of genetic susceptibility: a population-based cohort study with propensity score matching.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Senna: As immunity boosting herb against Covid-19 and several other diseases.Journal of herbal medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConstipation is commonly self-managed with over-the-counter laxatives. The study aim was to explore laxative choice, healthcare professional recommendations in laxative selection, and laxative effectiveness when laxatives are used for treatment and for prevention of constipation by community-dwelling adults.
methodsA nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults in Australia was surveyed. Participants completed an online questionnaire. Z tests for differences in proportions were used to compare the proportion of laxatives by class when used either for treatment or for prevention of constipation by choice of laxative, healthcare professional recommendation, and perceived effectiveness.
resultsThe questionnaire was completed by 2024 participants. Laxatives were used by 37% (n = 747) of participants with 31.3% using laxatives for treatment, 19.3% for prevention, and 49.7% using laxatives for both purposes. The most common laxatives used for treatment and prevention were contact laxatives (39.8% and 31.1% respectively) and bulk-forming laxatives (34.3% and 44.6% respectively). Of all laxatives used, 56.4% of laxatives were chosen with healthcare professional recommendation, and 53.5% of laxatives were found effective.
conclusionLaxatives were used both for treatment and for prevention of constipation. However, laxatives are often perceived to be ineffective and healthcare professionals are not always involved in laxative choice. Modified guidelines which address the use of laxatives for both treatment and prevention, and increased healthcare professional involvement in appropriate choice and use of laxatives, may be required to improve constipation management in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.