ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020
Preimplantation loss of fertilized human ova: estimating the unobservable.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The embryo game uncovers hidden cell behaviours.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Generation of Human Naïve Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Blastoids in Thermoformed Microwell Platforms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Genomics of pregnancy loss.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- α-Ketoglutarate promotes trophectoderm induction and maturation from naive human embryonic stem cells.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Article
- PDGFRβ Activation Induced the Bovine Embryonic Genome Activation via Enhanced NFYA Nuclear Localization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Events Leading to the Establishment of Pregnancy and Placental Formation: The Need to Fine-Tune the Nomenclature on Pregnancy and Gestation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Overlapping functions of RBBP4 and RBBP7 in regulating cell proliferation and histone H3.3 deposition during mouse preimplantation development.Epigenetics · 2022Article
- Review
- Selfish evolution of placental hormones.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2022Article
- Nitrate in Drinking Water and Time to Pregnancy or Medically Assisted Reproduction in Women and Men: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the Danish National Birth Cohort.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and trophectoderm lineage specification by the mevalonate pathway in the mouse preimplantation embryo.Molecular human reproduction · 2021Article
- Post-conception heat exposure increases clinically unobserved pregnancy losses.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Closing the circle of reverse genetics in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Correction to: Dealing with loss of life across the spectrum of humankind.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Mechanisms of human embryo development: from cell fate to tissue shape and back.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionWhat proportion of fertilized human ova are lost before implantation? SUMMARY ANSWER: An estimated 40 to 50% of fertilized ova fail to implant. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Preimplantation loss is not detectable with current technology. Published estimates of preimplantation loss range from 10 to 70%. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We combine data from epidemiologic, demographic, laboratory and in vitro fertilization studies to construct an empirical framework for the estimation of preimplantation loss. This framework is summarized in a user-friendly Excel file included in supplement. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsWe draw from multiple sources to generate plausible estimates of fecundability, sterility, transient anovulation, intercourse patterns and the proportion of ova fertilized in the presence of sperm. We combine these estimates to generate a summary estimate of preimplantation loss. This estimate can be considered an average for couples in their prime reproductive years. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Under a plausible range of assumptions, we estimate that 40 to 50% of fertilized ova fail to implant. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A crucial factor in estimating preimplantation loss is the probability that an ovum will be fertilized when exposed to sperm. Human data are available only from in vitro fertilization (IVF), which may not accurately represent events in vivo. We therefore assume a range of in vivo fertilization rates, from 64% (human IVF data) to 90% (mouse data). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOur estimate of preimplantation loss takes into account the biological processes relevant to fertilization and loss. Using this empirical basis for estimation, we find support for the usual assumption that risk of loss is highest in the earliest days following fertilization. Furthermore, this framework can provide improved estimates as better reproductive data become available. To the extent that our estimates are accurate, more fertilized ova are apparently lost in vitro than in vivo, suggesting that further improvements in IVF success rates may be possible. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH. Professor Adashi serves as Co-Chair of the Safety Advisory Board of Ohana Biosciences, Inc. The other authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.