Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296821›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2021

Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species.

Christopher T Cole, Clay J Morrow, Hilary L Barker, Kennedy F Rubert-Nason, Jennifer F L Riehl, Tobias G Köllner, Nathalie D Lackus, Richard L Lindroth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Growth-defense trade-offs shape population genetic composition in an iconic forest tree species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher T ColeDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
Clay J MorrowDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
Hilary L BarkerDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
Kennedy F Rubert-NasonDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
Jennifer F L RiehlDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
Tobias G KöllnerMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Biochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Strasse 8, Jena, Germany.
Nathalie D LackusMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Biochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Strasse 8, Jena, Germany.
Richard L LindrothDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIntraspecific variation in foundation species of forest ecosystems can shape community and ecosystem properties, particularly when that variation has a genetic basis. Traits mediating interactions with other species are predicted by simple allocation models to follow ontogenetic patterns that are rarely studied in trees. The aim of this research was to identify the roles of genotype, ontogeny and genotypic trade-offs shaping growth, defence and reproduction in aspen.

methodsWe established a common garden replicating >500 aspen genets in Wisconsin, USA. Trees were measured through the juvenile period into the onset of reproduction, for growth, defence chemistry (phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins), nitrogen, extrafloral nectaries, leaf morphology (specific leaf area), flower production and foliar herbivory and disease. We also assayed the TOZ19 sex marker and heterozygosity at ten microsatellite loci. KEY

resultsWe found high levels of genotypic variation for all traits, and high heritabilities for both the traits and their ontogenetic trajectories. Ontogeny strongly shaped intraspecific variation, and trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction supported some predictions while contradicting others. Both direct resistance (chemical defence) and indirect defence (extrafloral nectaries) declined during the juvenile stage, prior to the onset of reproduction. Reproduction was higher in trees that were larger, male and had higher individual heterozygosity. Growth was diminished by genotypic allocation to both direct and indirect defence as well as to reproduction, but we found no evidence of trade-offs between defence and reproduction.

conclusionsKey traits affecting the ecological communities of aspen have high levels of genotypic variation and heritability, strong patterns of ontogeny and clear trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction. The architecture of aspen's community genetics - its ontogeny, trade-offs and especially its great variability - is shaped by both its broad range and the diverse community of associates, and in turn further fosters that diversity.

Indexed as

PopulusEcosystemGenotypePlant LeavesReproductionTreesCommunity geneticsheterozygosityintraspecific trait variationleaf economic spectrumontogenyPopulus tremuloidessalicinoidstanninstrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID32296821
PMCPMC7988516
OpenAlexW3016886514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.