Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296713›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020

The Evolution of Data Fusion Methodologies Developed to Reconstruct Coronary Artery Geometry From Intravascular Imaging and Coronary Angiography Data: A Comprehensive Review.

Yakup Kilic, Hannah Safi, Retesh Bajaj, Patrick W Serruys, Pieter Kitslaar, Anantharaman Ramasamy, Vincenzo Tufaro, Yoshinobu Onuma, Anthony Mathur, Ryo Torii and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research progress on image-based calculation of coronary artery fractional flow reserve].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yakup KilicDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah SafiInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Retesh BajajDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Patrick W SerruysFaculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pieter KitslaarDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Anantharaman RamasamyDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Vincenzo TufaroCentre for Cardiovascular Medicine and Device Innovation, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom.
Yoshinobu OnumaErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anthony MathurDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ryo ToriiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andreas BaumbachDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christos V BourantasDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that regulate atherosclerotic plaque formation and evolution is a crucial step for developing treatment strategies that will prevent plaque progression and reduce cardiovascular events. Advances in signal processing and the miniaturization of medical devices have enabled the design of multimodality intravascular imaging catheters that allow complete and detailed assessment of plaque morphology and biology. However, a significant limitation of these novel imaging catheters is that they provide two-dimensional (2D) visualization of the lumen and vessel wall and thus they cannot portray vessel geometry and 3D lesion architecture. To address this limitation computer-based methodologies and user-friendly software have been developed. These are able to off-line process and fuse intravascular imaging data with X-ray or computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to reconstruct coronary artery anatomy. The aim of this review article is to summarize the evolution in the field of coronary artery modeling; we thus present the first methodologies that were developed to model vessel geometry, highlight the modifications introduced in revised methods to overcome the limitations of the first approaches and discuss the challenges that need to be addressed, so these techniques can have broad application in clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

3D reconstructioncoronary angiographycoronary artery modelingdata fusion methodologieshybrid intravascular imaging

Identifiers

PMID32296713
PMCPMC7136420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.