ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020
Toward the Prediction of Multi-Spin State Charges of a Heme Model by Random Forest Regression.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The random forest regression (RFR) model was introduced to predict the multiple spin state charges of a heme model, which is important for the molecular dynamic simulation of the spin crossover phenomenon. In this work, a multiple spin state structure data set with 39,368 structures of the simplified heme-oxygen binding model was built from the non-adiabatic dynamic simulation trajectories. The ESP charges of each atom were calculated and used as the real-valued response. The conformational adapted charge model (CAC) of three spin states was constructed by an RFR model using symmetry functions. The results show that our RFR model can effectively predict the on the fly atomic charges with the varying conformations as well as the atomic charge of different spin states in the same conformation, thus achieving the balance of accuracy and efficiency. The average mean absolute error of the predicted charges of each spin state is <0.02 e. The comparison studies on descriptors showed a maximum 0.06 e improvement in prediction of the charge of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.