Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296645›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Comparison and Fusion of Deep Learning and Radiomics Features of Ground-Glass Nodules to Predict the Invasiveness Risk of Stage-I Lung Adenocarcinomas in CT Scan.

Xianwu Xia, Jing Gong, Wen Hao, Ting Yang, Yeqing Lin, Shengping Wang, Weijun Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xianwu XiaDepartment of Radiology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Jing GongDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Wen HaoDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ting YangDepartment of Radiology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Yeqing LinDepartment of Radiology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Shengping WangDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Weijun PengDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For stage-I lung adenocarcinoma, the 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) rates of non-invasive adenocarcinoma (non-IA) is different with invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). This study aims to develop CT image based artificial intelligence (AI) schemes to classify between non-IA and IA nodules, and incorporate deep learning (DL) and radiomics features to improve the classification performance. We collect 373 surgical pathological confirmed ground-glass nodules (GGNs) from 323 patients in two centers. It involves 205 non-IA (including 107 adenocarcinoma

Indexed as

CT scandeep learningground-glass noduleinvasiveness risklung adenocarcinomaradiomics

Identifiers

PMID32296645
PMCPMC7136522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.