ArticleFood science and biotechnology2020
Isolation and physicochemical property of individual parenchyma cells from mealy sweet potato.
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flour and parenchyma cells from sweet potato and potato: a comparative study of their physicochemical properties and digestibility.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study prepared the dehydrated sweet potato parenchyma cell (SPPC) by isolating intact, individual parenchyma cells (PC) from sweet potato (SP) flesh using pectinase, and compared its chemical compositions, solubility and swelling power, gelatinization, and pasting viscosity to sweet potato starch (SPST) and flour (SPFL). The highest yield of SPPC was achieved when frozen SP whole-tissues were treated with pectin lyase. The majority constituting SPPC was intact, individual PCs fully filled with SPST granules. SPPC possessed lower crude protein and ash contents than SPFL. SPPC revealed lower solubility and swelling power, higher gelatinization temperatures, and lower pasting viscosity than SPST, while it showed lower solubility, higher swelling power, lower gelatinization temperatures, and higher pasting viscosity than SPFL. Overall, SPPC characteristics may result from intact PC walls surrounding clusters of SPPC granules, and SPPC could be considered an alternative to SPFL and SPST for expanding industrial applications of SP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.