Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296541›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2020

Comparative study of the effects of gold and silver nanoparticles on the metabolism of human dermal fibroblasts.

Yan Huang, Xiaoying Lü, Rong Chen, Ye Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan HuangState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P.R. China.
Xiaoying LüState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P.R. China.
Rong ChenState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P.R. China.
Ye ChenState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P.R. China.
Southeast University · CNState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to explore the effects of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and silver nanoparticles (SNPs) with different cytotoxicities on human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) at the metabolic level. First, ∼20 nm of GNPs and SNPs were prepared, and their effects on the proliferation of HDFs were evaluated. Then, a metabolomics technique was used to analyse the effects of GNPs and SNPs on the expression profiles of metabolites in HDFs after 4, 8 and 24 h of treatment. Furthermore, the key metabolites and key metabolic pathways involved in the interaction of GNPs and SNPs with HDFs were identified through expression pattern analysis and metabolic pathway analysis of differentially expressed metabolites and were finally verified by experiments. The results of the cytotoxicity experiments showed that there was no cytotoxicity after the treatment of GNPs for 72 h, while the cytotoxicity of the SNPs reached grade 1 after 72 h. By using metabolomics analysis, 29, 30 and 27 metabolites were shown to be differentially expressed in HDFs after GNP treatment, while SNPs induced the differential expression of 13, 33 and 22 metabolites after 4, 8 and 24 h of treatment, respectively. Six and four candidate key metabolites in the GNP and SNP groups were identified by expression pattern analysis and metabolic pathway analysis, respectively. The key metabolic pathways in the GNP and SNP groups were identified as the glutathione metabolic pathway (the key metabolite of which was glutathione) and the citrate cycle pathway (the key metabolite of which was malic acid). Based on the experiments used to verify the key metabolites and key metabolic pathways, it was found that the increase in glutathione after GNP treatment might trigger an oxidative stress protection mechanism and thus avoid cytotoxicity. After exposure to SNPs, the citric acid content was increased, mainly through the citrate cycle pathway, thereby inhibiting the synthesis of malic acid to affect the formation of ATP and finally leading to cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

gold and silver nanoparticleshuman dermal fibroblastsmetabolic pathwaymetabolomics and bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID32296541
PMCPMC7147366
OpenAlexW3001975624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.