Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296506›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2020

Investigation of meropenem stability after reconstitution: the influence of buffering and challenges to meet the NHS Yellow Cover Document compliance for continuous infusions in an outpatient setting.

Conor Jamieson, Michael Charles Allwood, Donata Stonkute, Andrew Wallace, Alan-Shaun Wilkinson, Tim Hills, BSAC Drug Stability Working Party

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of antibiotic release and antibacterial efficacy from pendant glutathione hydrogels using ex vivo porcine skin.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Conor JamiesonPharmacy Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Michael Charles AllwoodBiopharma Stability Testing Laboratory Ltd, Nottingham, UK.
Donata StonkuteBiopharma Stability Testing Laboratory Ltd, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew WallaceBiopharma Stability Testing Laboratory Ltd, Nottingham, UK.
Alan-Shaun WilkinsonBiopharma Stability Testing Laboratory Ltd, Nottingham, UK.
Tim HillsPharmacy Department and OPAT Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
BSAC Drug Stability Working Party
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the influence of different buffers, pH and meropenem concentrations on the degradation rates of meropenem in aqueous solution during storage at 32°C, with the aim of developing a formulation suitable for 24-hour infusion in an ambulatory elastomeric device, compliant with the latest National Health Service Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance Committee Yellow Cover Document (YCD) requirements. Methods: Meropenem was diluted to 6.25 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL in aqueous solutions adjusted to various pH with phosphate or citrate buffer and assessed for stability. Meropenem concentrations were determined using a validated stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography method at time 0 and following storage for up to 24 hours at 32°C as per the YCD requirements. Results: Degradation was observed to be slowest in citrate buffer around pH 7 and at a meropenem concentration of 6.25 mg/mL; however, losses exceeded 10% after storage for 24 hours at 32°C in all of the diluents tested in the study. Conclusions: Meropenem at concentrations between 6.25 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL as tested is not sufficiently stable to administer as a 24-hour infusion in ambulatory device reservoirs. If the YCD 95% minimum content limit is applied, the infusion period must be reduced to less than 6 hours for body-worn devices, especially at the higher concentration studied (25 mg/mL). This limits the possibility of using elastomeric devices to deliver continuous infusions of meropenem as part of a wider outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsBuffersChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug StabilityHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInfusions, IntravenousMeropenemState MedicineAnti-Bacterial AgentsBuffersMeropenemambulatorydrug stabilityelastomeric devicemeropenemopatoutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

Identifiers

PMID32296506
PMCPMC7147560
OpenAlexW2911224159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.