Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296497›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2020

Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam in daily clinical practice: high-performance liquid chromatography versus immunoassay.

Maria Mendoza Aguilera, María Dolores Bellés Medall, Tamara Álvarez Martín, Óscar Pascual Marmaneu, Carla Liñana Granell, Raúl Ferrando Piqueres

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Two methods for therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: act according to circumstances.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Mendoza AguileraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.
María Dolores Bellés MedallDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.
Tamara Álvarez MartínDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.
Óscar Pascual MarmaneuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.
Carla Liñana GranellDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-9307
Raúl Ferrando PiqueresDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellon, Spain.
Hospital General Universitari de Castelló · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Although levetiracetam presents an easy dosing and tolerability, therapeutic drug monitoring may be recommended in certain situations. Measurement of levetiracetam in serum plasma is commonly done by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). After ARK Diagnostics marketed an enzyme immunoassay (IA) for levetiracetam in serum or plasma, automated determinations are possible. In this study, the performance of this immunoassay and the impact of automation on the follow-up in patients treated with levetiracetam is evaluated. We also detected those subpopulations of patients who may benefit the most from this therapeutic drug monitoring. Methods: Samples from 50 outpatients diagnosed with epilepsy and treated with levetiracetam were collected. This new IA was performed on the Architect c4000 analyser and compared with the HPLC. Then, a retrospective observational study that included serum samples of levetiracetam for 24 months, was conducted to evaluate the impact of automattion and the influence of some variables (age, sex, renal function, and co-administration of valproic acid and glucuronidation-inducing drugs) in levetiracetam apparent oral clearance (CLp/F) by a multivariate linear regression. Results: The mean high-performance liquid chromatography quantified concentration (CpHPLC) was 18.43 mcg/mL (95% CI: 15.48 to 21.39) and immunoassay concentration (CpEI) was 18.35 mcg/mL (95% CI: 15.20 to 21.50) (P=0.861). The Pearson's linear correlation coefficient obtained in the analysis was r Conclusions: The Ark method performed on the Architect is fully acceptable and can be used routinely to measure levetiracetam plasmatic concentration levels. It has demonstrated the need for closer monitoring in patients with renal failure or co-administration of glucuronidation-inducing drugs.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug MonitoringEpilepsyFemaleHumansImmunoassayLevetiracetamMaleRetrospective StudiesAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamanticonvulsantsdrug monitoringhigh performance liquid chromatographyimmunoassaylevetiracetam

Identifiers

PMID32296497
PMCPMC7147562
OpenAlexW2897685699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.