ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Integrated Analysis to Evaluate the Prognostic Value of Signature mRNAs in Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- mRNA markers for survival prediction in glioblastoma multiforme patients: a systematic review with bioinformatic analyses.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Comprehensive machine learning-based integration develops a novel prognostic model for glioblastoma.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024Article
- Unveiling the therapeutic potential of IHMT-337 in glioma treatment: targeting the EZH2-SLC12A5 axis.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- An update on the molecular biology of glioblastoma, with clinical implications and progress in its treatment.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Review
- A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel to Genotype Gliomas.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Expression profile and prognostic values of Chromobox family members in human glioblastoma.Aging · 2022Article
- Scouting for common genes in the heterogenous hypoxic tumor microenvironment and their validation in glioblastoma.3 Biotech · 2021Article
- GNG5 is a novel oncogene associated with cell migration, proliferation, and poor prognosis in glioma.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Autoencoders for Cancer Subtype Detection Using Multi-Omics Data.Cancers · 2021Article
- Identification of key modules and hub genes in glioblastoma multiforme based on co-expression network analysis.FEBS open bio · 2021Article
- A Computational Framework to Identify Biomarkers for Glioma Recurrence and Potential Drugs Targeting Them.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Fast and Efficient Approach to Obtaining High-Purity Glioma Stem Cell Culture.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGliomas are the most common intracranial tumors and are classified as I-IV. Among them, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common invasive glioma with a poor prognosis. New molecular biomarkers that can predict clinical outcomes in GBM patients must be identified, which will help comprehend their pathogenesis and supply personalized treatment. Our research revealed four powerful survival indicators in GBM by reanalyzing microarray data and genetic sequencing data in public databases. Moreover, it unraveled new potential therapeutic targets which could help improve the survival time and quality of life of GBM patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo identify prognostic signatures in GBMs, we analyzed the gene profiling data of GBM and standard brain samples from the Gene Expression Omnibus, including four datasets and RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) containing 152 glioblastoma tissues. We performed the differential analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and Cox regression analysis.
resultsAfter differential analysis in GSE12657, GSE15824, GSE42656 and GSE50161, overlapping differentially expressed genes were identified. We identified 110 up-regulated DEGs and 75 down-regulated DEGs in the GBM samples. Significantly enriched subclasses of the GO classification of these genes included mitotic sister chromatid separation, mitotic nuclear division and so on. In KEGG pathway analysis, the most abundant terms were ECM-receptor interaction and protein digestion and absorption. WGCNA analysis was performed on these 185 DEGs in 152 glioblastoma samples obtained from TCGA, and gene co-expression networks were constructed. We then performed a multivariate Cox analysis and established a Cox proportional hazards regression model using the top 20 genes significantly correlated with survival time. We identified a four-protein prognostic signature that could divide patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Increased expression of SLC12A5, CCL2, IGFBP2, and PDPN was associated with increased risk scores. Finally, the K-M curves confirmed that these genes could be used as independent predictors of survival in patients with glioblastoma.
conclusionOur analytical study identified a set of potential biomarkers that could predict survival and may contribute to successful treatment of GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.