Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32296420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Multiplexed Proteomic Analysis for Diagnosis and Screening of Five Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders From Dried Blood Spots.

Christopher J Collins, Fan Yi, Remwilyn Dayuha, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Hans D Ochs, Alexandra Freeman, Helen C Su, Amanda G Paulovich, Gesmar R S Segundo, Troy Torgerson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Editor's Choice for Issue 4, Volume 7.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Future Perspectives of Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Immunity.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher J CollinsSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Fan YiSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Remwilyn DayuhaSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jeffrey R WhiteakerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Hans D OchsSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alexandra FreemanNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Helen C SuNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Amanda G PaulovichFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Gesmar R S SegundoDepartment of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Troy TorgersonSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Si Houn HahnSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

Primary Immune Deficiency ClinicZIAAI001247 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FREEMAN, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2025
$8.7M
Proteogenomic Studies aimed at understanding ovarian tumor responses to agents targeting the DNA damage response and translating this knowledge into clinical benefitU01CA214114 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BIRRER, MICHAEL, PAULOVICH, AMANDA G · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
Understanding DOCK8 Function in Health and Human DiseaseZIAAI001193 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SU, HELEN CHUN-HUI · 2014 to 2025
$4.5M
Multiplexed immuno-SRM screening for primary immunodeficienciesR01AI123135 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HAHN, SIHOUN · 2016 to 2020
$4.5M
A proteomics research specialist in developing targeted mass spectrometry methods for quantifying proteins important in cancerR50CA211499 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Jeff Whiteaker · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211499NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214114NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of Primary Immunodeficiencies Disorders (PIDDs) is of paramount importance for effective treatment and disease management. Many PIDDs would be strong candidates for newborn screening (NBS) if robust screening methods could identify patients from dried blood spots (DBS) during the neonatal period. As majority of congenital PIDDs result in the reduction or absence of specific proteins, direct quantification of these target proteins represents an attractive potential screening tool. Unfortunately, detection is often limited by the extremely low protein concentrations in blood cells and limited blood volume present in DBS. We have recently developed a robust novel method for quantification of low abundance proteins in DBS for PIDDs using peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to selected reaction monitoring (immuno-SRM). Here, we further generated a multiplexed Immuno-SRM panel for simultaneous screening of eight signature peptides representing five PIDD-specific and two cell-type specific proteins from DBS. In samples from 28 PIDD patients including two carriers, representing X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA), Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS), X-Linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease (XL-CGD), DOCK8 Deficiency and ADA deficiency, peptides representing each disease are significantly reduced relative to normal controls and patient identification had excellent agreement with clinical and molecular diagnosis. Also included in the multiplex panel are cell specific markers for platelets (CD42) and Natural Killer Cells (CD56). In patients with WAS, CD42 levels were found to be significantly reduced consistent with characteristic thrombocytopenia. A patient with WAS analyzed before and after bone marrow transplant showed normalized WAS protein and platelet CD42 after treatment highlighting the ability of immuno-SRM to monitor the effects of PIDD treatment. The assay was readily reproduced in two separate laboratories with similar analytical performance and complete agreement in patient diagnosis demonstrating the effective standardized methods. A high-throughput Immuno-SRM method screens PIDD-specific peptides in a 2.5-min runtime meeting high volume NBS workflow requirements was also demonstrated in this report. This high-throughput method returned identical results to the standard Immuno-SRM PIDD panel. Immuno-SRM peptide analysis represents a robust potential clinical diagnostic for identifying and studying PIDD patients from easily collected and shipped DBS and supports a significant potential for early PIDD diagnosis through newborn screening.

Indexed as

AnimalsDried Blood Spot TestingFemaleGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansMicePrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryDOCK6 protein, humanGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorsdried blood spotsimmuno-SRMnewborn screeningprimary immunodeficiency disordersproteomics

Identifiers

PMID32296420
PMCPMC7141245
OpenAlexW3014897076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.