ArticleTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC2018
3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.
Article in Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advantages of stereolithographic 3D printing in the fabrication of the Affiblot device for dot-blot assays.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Use of 3D Printing Techniques to Fabricate Implantable Microelectrodes for Electrochemical Detection of Biomarkers in the Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases.ACS measurement science au · 2023Review
- Development of 3D Printed Enzymatic Microreactors for Lipase-Catalyzed Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Media.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Applicability of Selected 3D Printing Materials in Electrochemistry.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
- 3D Printing in Heterogeneous Catalysis-The State of the Art.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Powder-Based 3D Printing for the Fabrication of Device with Micro and Mesoscale Features.Micromachines · 2020Review
- 3D Printed Microfluidics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2020Review
- 3D printing direct to industrial roll-to-roll casting for fast prototyping of scalable microfluidic systems.PloS one · 2020Article
- Developments with 3D bioprinting for novel drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2018Review
- A Feasibility Study of Processing Polydimethylsiloxane⁻Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Composites by a Low-Cost Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D printing (3DP), an additive manufacturing (AM) approach allowing for rapid prototyping and decentralized fabrication on-demand, has become a common method for creating parts or whole devices. The wide scope of the AM extends from organized sectors of construction, ornament, medical, and R&D industries to individual explorers attributed to the low cost, high quality printers along with revolutionary tools and polymers. While progress is being made but big manufacturing challenges are still there. Considering the quickly shifting narrative towards miniaturized analytical systems (MAS) we focus on the development/rapid prototyping and manufacturing of MAS with 3DP, and application dependent challenges in engineering designs and choice of the polymeric materials and provide an exhaustive background to the applications of 3DP in biology and chemistry. This will allow readers to perceive the most important features of AM in creating (i) various individual and modular components, and (ii) complete integrated tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.