Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295889›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence Are Emerging Diagnostic Tools for the Clinical Microbiologist.

Daniel D Rhoads

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Validation of Vetscan ImagystParasites & vectors · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel D RhoadsDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA daniel.rhoads@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-5191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming an important component of clinical microbiology informatics. Researchers, microbiologists, laboratorians, and diagnosticians are interested in AI-based testing because these solutions have the potential to improve a test's turnaround time, quality, and cost. A study by Mathison et al. used computer vision AI (B. A. Mathison, J. L. Kohan, J. F. Walker, R. B. Smith, et al., J Clin Microbiol 58:e02053-19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02053-19), but additional opportunities for AI applications exist within the clinical microbiology laboratory. Large data sets within clinical microbiology that are amenable to the development of AI diagnostics include genomic information from isolated bacteria, metagenomic microbial findings from primary specimens, mass spectra captured from cultured bacterial isolates, and large digital images, which is the medium that Mathison et al. chose to use. AI in general and computer vision in specific are emerging tools that clinical microbiologists need to study, develop, and implement in order to improve clinical microbiology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical Laboratory ServicesComputersLaboratoriesNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligencebioinformaticscomputer visiondigital pathologymicrobiologyparasitology

Identifiers

PMID32295889
PMCPMC7269399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.