Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295647›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review.

Claire Kerins, Sheena McHugh, Jenny McSharry, Caitlin M Reardon, Catherine Hayes, Ivan J Perry, Fiona Geaney, Suzanne Seery, Colette Kelly

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Can Social Cognitive Theory Influence Breakfast Frequency in an Institutional Context: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire KerinsDiscipline of Health Promotion, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. c.kerins2@nuigalway.ie.
Sheena McHughSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland.
Jenny McSharryHealth Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
Caitlin M ReardonAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI, 48113-0170, USA.
Catherine HayesDiscipline of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin Russell Centre, Tallaght Cross, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Ivan J PerrySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland.
Fiona GeaneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland.
Suzanne SeeryNational Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, Croí Heart and Stroke Centre, Moyola Lane, Newcastle, Galway, Ireland.
Colette KellyDiscipline of Health Promotion, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating outside the home contributes to poor dietary habits worldwide and is associated with increased body fat and weight gain. Evidence shows menu labelling is effective in promoting healthier food choices; however, implementation issues have arisen. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from the perspective of the food service industry.

methodsPeer-reviewed and grey literature were searched using databases, specialised search engines and public health organisation websites. Screening reference lists, citation chaining and contacting authors of all included studies were undertaken. Primary research studies relevant to direct supply-side stakeholders were eligible for inclusion. There were no restrictions on menu labelling scheme or format, study methods, publication year or language. At least two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal. The results were synthesised using the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach, with reference to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

resultsSeventeen studies met the eligibility criteria, with the majority rated as average quality (n = 10). The most frequently cited barriers were coded to the CFIR constructs 'Consumer Needs & Resources' (e.g. lack of customer demand for/interest in menu labelling, risk of overwhelmed/confused customers) and 'Compatibility' with organisation work processes (e.g. lack of standardised recipes, limited space on menus). Frequently cited facilitators were coded to the CFIR constructs 'Relative Advantage' of menu labelling (e.g. improved business image/reputation) and 'Consumer Needs & Resources' (e.g. customer demand for/interest in menu labelling, providing nutrition information to customers). An adapted framework consisting of a priori and new constructs was developed, which illustrates the relationships between domains.

conclusionThis review generates an adapted CFIR framework for understanding implementation of menu labelling interventions. It highlights that implementation is influenced by multiple interdependent factors, particularly related to the external and internal context of food businesses, and features of the menu labelling intervention. The findings can be used by researchers and practitioners to develop or select strategies to address barriers that impede implementation and to leverage facilitators that assist with implementation effort.

trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017083306.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood ServicesFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansMenu PlanningRestaurantsBarriersBest fit framework synthesisConsolidated framework for implementation researchFacilitatorsImplementationMenu labellingMixed methodsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32295647
PMCPMC7161210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.