Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295625›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2020

Tumor sequencing is useful to refine the analysis of germline variants in unexplained high-risk breast cancer families.

Cédric Van Marcke, Raphaël Helaers, Anne De Leener, Ahmad Merhi, Céline A Schoonjans, Jérôme Ambroise, Christine Galant, Paul Delrée, Françoise Rothé, Isabelle Bar and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cédric Van MarckeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Raphaël HelaersHuman Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne De LeenerCenter for Human Genetics, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Ahmad MerhiLaboratory of Translational Oncology and IPG BioBank, Institute of Pathology and Genetics, Gosselies, Belgium.
Céline A SchoonjansHuman Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jérôme AmbroiseCenter for Applied Molecular Technologies, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine GalantBreast Clinic, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Paul DelréeDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Genetics, Gosselies, Belgium.
Françoise RothéBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle BarLaboratory of Translational Oncology and IPG BioBank, Institute of Pathology and Genetics, Gosselies, Belgium.
Elsa KhouryGenetics of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pascal BrouillardHuman Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Luc CanonDepartment of Oncology-Hematology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Peter VuylstekeDepartment of Medical Oncology, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.
Jean-Pascal MachielsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Martine BerlièreBreast Clinic, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Nisha LimayeGenetics of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Miikka VikkulaHuman Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
François P DuhouxDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. francois.duhoux@uclouvain.be.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEde Duve Institute · BEInstitute of Pathology and Genetics · BECHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BEGrand Charleroi Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Action 29 of the Plan Cancer .fondation contre le cancer .Fondation Saint-Luc .Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS .Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (UCLouvain) .
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultigene panels are routinely used to assess for predisposing germline mutations in families at high breast cancer risk. The number of variants of unknown significance thereby identified increases with the number of sequenced genes. We aimed to determine whether tumor sequencing can help refine the analysis of germline variants based on second somatic genetic events in the same gene.

methodsWhole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on whole blood DNA from 70 unrelated breast cancer patients referred for genetic testing and without a BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, or CHEK2 mutation. Rare variants were retained in a list of 735 genes. WES was performed on matched tumor DNA to identify somatic second hits (copy number alterations (CNAs) or mutations) in the same genes. Distinct methods (among which immunohistochemistry, mutational signatures, homologous recombination deficiency, and tumor mutation burden analyses) were used to further study the role of the variants in tumor development, as appropriate.

resultsSixty-eight patients (97%) carried at least one germline variant (4.7 ± 2.0 variants per patient). Of the 329 variants, 55 (17%) presented a second hit in paired tumor tissue. Of these, 53 were CNAs, resulting in tumor enrichment (28 variants) or depletion (25 variants) of the germline variant. Eleven patients received variant disclosure, with clinical measures for five of them. Seven variants in breast cancer-predisposing genes were considered not implicated in oncogenesis. One patient presented significant tumor enrichment of a germline variant in the oncogene ERBB2, in vitro expression of which caused downstream signaling pathway activation.

conclusionTumor sequencing is a powerful approach to refine variant interpretation in cancer-predisposing genes in high-risk breast cancer patients. In this series, the strategy provided clinically relevant information for 11 out of 70 patients (16%), adapted to the considered gene and the familial clinical phenotype.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBreast cancerGermlineMutational signaturesPredispositionSecond hitVariant of unknown significance

Identifiers

PMID32295625
PMCPMC7161277
OpenAlexW3017069486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.