Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295621›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Like me, like you - relative importance of peers and siblings on children's fast food consumption and screen time but not sports club participation depends on age.

Leonie H Bogl, Kirsten Mehlig, Wolfgang Ahrens, Wencke Gwozdz, Stefaan de Henauw, Dénes Molnár, Luis Moreno, Iris Pigeot, Paola Russo, Antonia Solea and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 10 countries.

Leonie H BoglLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. leonie-helen.bogl@meduniwien.ac.at.
Kirsten MehligSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Wolfgang AhrensLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany.
Wencke GwozdzDepartment of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Stefaan de HenauwDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dénes MolnárDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Luis MorenoGENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Iris PigeotLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany.
Paola RussoInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy.
Antonia SoleaResearch and Education Institute of Child Health, Strovolos, Cyprus.
Toomas VeidebaumDepartment of Chronic Diseases, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
Jaakko KaprioInstitute of Molecular Medicine FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lauren LissnerSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Antje HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. hebestr@leibniz-bips.de.
IDEFICS and I. Family Consortia
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FICopenhagen Business School · DKGhent University · BEInstitute of Food Science · ITNational Institute for Health Development · EEUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle interventions to prevent paediatric obesity often target family and peer settings; their success is likely to depend on the influence that peers and families exert on children's lifestyle behaviors at different developmental stages.

objectiveFirst, to determine whether children's lifestyle behavior more closely resembles their peers' or siblings' behaviors. Secondly, to investigate longitudinally whether children's behavioral change is predicted by that of their peers or their siblings as they grow older.

methodsThe European prospective IDEFICS/I.Family cohort (baseline survey: 2007/2008, first follow-up: 2009/2010, and second follow-up: 2013/2014) aims at investigating risk factors for overweight and related behaviors during childhood and adolescence. The present investigation includes 2694 observations of children and their siblings aged 2 to 18 years. Peers were defined as same-sex, same-age children in the same community and identified from the full cohort. The longitudinal analysis (mean follow-up time: 3.7 years) includes 525 sibling pairs. Children's lifestyle behaviors including fast food consumption (frequency/week), screen time (hours/week) and sports club participation (hours/week) were assessed by questionnaire. Data were analyzed using multilevel linear models.

resultsChildren's lifestyle behavior was associated with the respective behavior of their peers and sibling for all 3 behaviors. For fast food consumption, the peer resemblance was more than 6-fold higher than the sibling resemblance and the peer resemblance surpassed the sibling resemblance by the age of 9-10 years. The similarities with peers for fast food consumption and screen time steadily increased, while the similarities with siblings steadily decreased with increasing age of the children (P

conclusionIn conclusion, our results support the implementation of multi-setting interventions for improving lifestyle behaviors in children. Our findings might also guide future intervention studies in the choice of timing and setting in which interventions are likely to be most effective. From the ages of 9-10 years onwards, family- or home-based interventions targeting children's fast food intake and screen time behavior may become less effective than school- or community-based interventions aimed at peer groups.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsLife StylePeer InfluenceScreen TimeSiblingsSportsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesAdolescentsChildrenFast foodPeer influencesPhysical activityScreen timeSibling pairsSports club

Identifiers

PMID32295621
PMCPMC7160987
OpenAlexW3016628582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.