Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295574›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2020

Social judgments on abortion and contraceptive use: a mixed methods study among secondary school teachers and student peer-counsellors in western Kenya.

Miranda Håkansson, Stephanie Super, Monica Oguttu, Marlene Makenzius

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03065842 (A Pre and Post Test Intervention Program to Prevent Abortion and Contraceptive-use Stigma Among School Youths in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03065842 nacompletednot on this map

A Pre and Post Test Intervention Program to Prevent Abortion and Contraceptive-use Stigma Among School Youths in Kenya: A Quasi-Experimental Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,207ConditionsSocial Stigma, Pregnancy, ContraceptionArmsAbortion- and contraceptive-use stigma reduction program, Usual Standards
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modern Contraceptive Use Among Young Women in Kampala Slums: Research Findings from the TOPOWA Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miranda HåkanssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. miranda.hakansson@gmail.com.
Stephanie SuperDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Monica OguttuKisumu Medical Education Trust (KMET), Kisumu, Kenya.
Marlene MakenziusDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2015-01194Vetenskapsrådet 2016-05670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Kenya, unsafe abortion is the leading cause of maternal deaths in adolescent girls aged 15-19 years, and a majority did not use a modern contraceptive before becoming pregnant. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes related to abortion and contraceptive use among secondary school teachers and student peer-counsellors in a low-resource setting in western Kenya.

methodsA mixed methods design, combining a questionnaire-survey and focus group discussions (FGDs), was utilised to explore attitudes to abortion and contraceptive use among teachers (n = 15) and student peer-counsellors (n = 21) at a secondary school in Kisumu, Kenya. First, two Likert scale questionnaires were used: a modified version of the Stigmatising Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (SABA) scale and the Contraceptive Use Stigma (CUS) scale. Secondly, four FGDs were conducted. Descriptive statistics and Abductive Thematic Network Analysis (ATNA) were used to analyse the data.

resultsOverall, Social judgments on abortion and contraceptive use were found among teachers and student peer-counsellors, with similar patterns between sexes. Christian and cultural values; A majority, 28/36 considered abortion a sin, and chastity and purity before marriage were highly valued feminine ideals. Discrimination and isolation; 18/36 believed that a girl who has had an abortion might be a bad influence on other girls, and 13/35 stated that an adolescent girl cannot decide for herself if to use a contraceptive method. Conflicting views on abortion and contraceptives; A third (11/34) believed that contraceptives may cause infertility, and its use was related to promiscuity. Girls associated with abortion and contraceptive use were considered immoral, lacking parental guidance, and were used to represent bad examples in school. Although conflicting views were present, sexuality was considered a taboo topic, which left adolescents ignorant on contraceptive use.

conclusionsAdolescent girls associated with abortion and contraceptive use are at risk for social judgements and discrimination, by both peers and teachers. Sexual and reproductive health training needs to be implemented in teacher education to increase knowledge on adolescent sexuality, abortion and contraceptive use to improve adolescents' sexual health and decrease the stigma.

trial registrationThis was a prestudy nested in a cluster randomised intervention study, registered on February 28, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03065842).

Indexed as

JudgmentPeer GroupSocial StigmaAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultAgedContraception BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPoverty AreasPregnancyAbortionAdolescent pregnancyComprehensive sexuality educationContraceptionStigma

Identifiers

PMID32295574
PMCPMC7161104
OpenAlexW3016819118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.