Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295568›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

"Meet people where they are": a qualitative study of community barriers and facilitators to HIV testing and HIV self-testing among African Americans in urban and rural areas in North Carolina.

Allison Mathews, Samantha Farley, Donaldson F Conserve, Kimberly Knight, Alston Le'Marus, Meredith Blumberg, Stuart Rennie, Joseph Tucker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison MathewsDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 South Columbia Street, MacNider Hall, Room #348 / CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7240, USA. mathewsallison@gmail.com.
Samantha FarleyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Donaldson F ConserveDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Kimberly KnightInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 South Columbia Street, MacNider Hall, Room #348 / CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7240, USA.
Alston Le'MarusDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Meredith BlumbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stuart RennieDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 South Columbia Street, MacNider Hall, Room #348 / CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7240, USA.
Joseph TuckerInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 333 South Columbia Street, MacNider Hall, Room #348 / CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7240, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USFielding Graduate University · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Spurring Innovation in HIV Testing and Linkage: A Crowdsourcing Approach -Diversity SupplementR01AI114310 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID, WEI, CHONGYI · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Functional Assessment of CTL Anergy in HIV InfectionR21AI110343 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YANG, OTTO O · 2014 to 2015
$424k
Acceptability and Feasibility of Unsupervised HIV Self-Testing Among Networks of Men in TanzaniaK99MH110343 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CONSERVE, DONALDSON · 2016 to 2017
$166k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114310NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH110343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing programs in the United States aim to reach ethnic minority populations who experience high incidence of HIV, yet 40% of African Americans have never been tested for HIV. The objective of this study is to identify community-based strategies to increase testing among African Americans in both urban and rural areas.

methodsThis study conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) informed by community-based participatory research principles to examine African American's concerns and ideas around HIV testing and HIV self-testing. Participants included highly affected (i.e., PLWH, MSM, PWID, low-income, teens and young adults) populations from African American communities in North Carolina, aged 15 years and older. We digitally transcribed and analyzed qualitative data using MAXQDA and axial coding to identify emergent themes.

resultsFifty-two men and women between 15 to 60 years old living in urban (n=41) and rural (n=11) areas of North Carolina participated in focus group discussions. HIV testing barriers differed by HIV testing setting: facility-based, community-based, and HIV self-testing. In community-based settings, barriers included confidentiality concerns. In facility-based settings (e.g., clinics), barriers included negative treatment by healthcare workers. With HIV self-testing, barriers included improper use of self-testing kits and lack of post-test support. HIV testing facilitators included partnering with community leaders, decentralizing testing beyond facility-based sites, and protecting confidentiality.

conclusionsFindings suggest that HIV testing concerns among African Americans vary by HIV testing setting. African Americans may be willing to test for HIV at community events in public locations if client confidentiality is preserved and use HIV self-testing kits in private if post-test social support and services are provided. These community-identified facilitators may improve African American testing rates and uptake of HIV self-testing kits.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUrban PopulationAfrican AmericansCommunity engagementHIVHIV self-testing

Identifiers

PMID32295568
PMCPMC7161271
OpenAlexW3016476047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.