Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295450›Full record

SynthesisJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2021

Physical Exercise Interventions Targeting Cognitive Functioning and the Cognitive Domains in Nondementia Samples: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.

David T Turner, Mandy X Hu, Ellen Generaal, Daniel Bos, M Kamran Ikram, Alis Heshmatollah, Lana Fani, M Arfan Ikram, Brenda W J H Penninx, Pim Cuijpers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David T TurnerDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-1542
Mandy X HuDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ellen GeneraalDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daniel BosDepartment of Epidemiology, 6993Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M Kamran IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, 6993Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Alis HeshmatollahDepartment of Epidemiology, 6993Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lana FaniDepartment of Epidemiology, 6993Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, 6993Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated whether physical exercise interventions improve cognitive functioning in nondementia populations.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of meta-analyses including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers completed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. Study characteristics, effect size data, and heterogeneity estimates were extracted and presented in tabular form. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 reviewers using the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The validity of results was considered based on AMSTAR-2 scores and study characteristics.

resultsWe included 11 meta-analyses: 6 focused on disease-free older adults and 5 on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) excluding dementia. These meta-analyses summarized 97 unique RCTs. Methodological quality ranged from critically low to high. For overall cognitive functioning, which was the outcome of 6 meta-analyses, 1 showed improvement due to exercise interventions in disease-free older adults (

conclusionsExercise may improve overall cognitive functioning in disease-free older adults, but there is too little high-quality evidence to conclude whether this is achieved through improvement in any of the specific cognitive domains assessed. There is clearer evidence that exercise may improve cognitive functioning in MCI, but again there is limited evidence across most cognitive domains.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionAgedExerciseExercise TherapyHumansMeta-Analysis as Topiccognitive functioningmeta-analysisneurodegenerationphysical exercise interventionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32295450
PMCPMC7859677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.