Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295092›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

Response of the Human Milk Microbiota to A Maternal Prebiotic Intervention is Individual and Influenced by Maternal Age.

Marina Padilha, Asker Brejnrod, Niels Banhos Danneskiold-Samsøe, Christian Hoffmann, Julia de Melo Iaucci, Vanessa Pereira Cabral, Douglas Xavier-Santos, Carla Romano Taddei, Karsten Kristiansen, Susana Marta Isay Saad

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breast Milk: A Meal Worth Having.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Microbiota of the Human Mammary Ecosystem.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marina PadilhaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Asker BrejnrodLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Niels Banhos Danneskiold-SamsøeLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Christian HoffmannSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Julia de Melo IaucciSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Vanessa Pereira CabralSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Douglas Xavier-SantosSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Carla Romano TaddeiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Karsten KristiansenLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Susana Marta Isay SaadSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Projects #2013/26435-3, 2013/07914-8, and 2016/07936-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal bacteria are shared with infants via breastfeeding. Prebiotics modulate the gut microbiota, promoting health benefits. We investigated whether the maternal diet supplementation with a prebiotic (fructooligosaccharides, FOS) could influence the milk microbiota. Twenty-eight lactating women received 4.5 g of fructooligosaccharides + 2 g of maltodextrin (FOS group) and twenty-five received 2 g of maltodextrin (placebo group) for 20 days. Breast-milk samples were taken before and after the intervention. The DNA from samples was used for 16S rRNA sequencing. No statistical differences between the groups were found for the bacterial genera after the intervention. However, the distances of the trajectories covered by paired samples from the beginning to the end of the supplementation were higher for the FOS group (

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaternal AgeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMilk, HumanOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesPrebioticsSingle-Blind MethodfructooligosaccharidemaltodextrinOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesPrebioticsbreastfeedingbreast milkclinical interventionfructooligosaccharideinfantmicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID32295092
PMCPMC7230887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.