Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32295030›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents.

Bruno José Nievas Soriano, Sonia García Duarte, Ana María Fernández Alonso, Antonio Bonillo Perales, Tesifón Parrón Carreño

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Digital Technology as a Collaborative Tool among Nursing Students-Survey Study and Validation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno José Nievas SorianoNursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, Almería 04120, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5917-7404
Sonia García DuarteObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Torrecárdenas Hospital, Almería 04009, Spain.
Ana María Fernández AlonsoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Torrecárdenas Hospital, Almería 04009, Spain.
Antonio Bonillo PeralesPediatrics Unit, Torrecárdenas Hospital, Almería 04009, Spain.
Tesifón Parrón CarreñoNursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, Almería 04120, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for health professionals to provide parents with not only evidence-based child health websites but also instruments to evaluate them. The main aim of this research was to develop a questionnaire for measuring users' evaluation of the usability, utility, confidence, the well-child section, and the accessibility of a Spanish pediatric eHealth website for parents. We further sought to evaluate the content validity and psychometric reliability of the instrument. A content validation study by expert review was performed, and the questionnaire was pilot tested. Psychometric analyses were used to establish scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability studies were performed using Cronbach's alpha and two split-half methods. The content validation of the questionnaire by experts was considered as excellent. The pilot web survey was completed by 516 participants. The exploratory factor analysis excluded 27 of the 41 qualitative initial items. The confirmatory factor analysis of the resultant 14-item questionnaire confirmed the five initial domains detected in the exploratory confirmatory analysis. The goodness of fit for the competing models was established through fit indices and confirmed the previously established domains. Adequate internal consistency was found for each of the subscales as well as the overall scale.

Indexed as

TelemedicineChildFemaleHumansMaleParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnaireseHealthevaluationmHealthpediatricquestionnairesurvey

Identifiers

PMID32295030
PMCPMC7215976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.