Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32294669›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Survival trends of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated at a cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil.

Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Max Moura de Oliveira, Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez, Diego Rodrigues Mendonça E Silva, Mauro Kazuo Ikeda, Maria Paula Curado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luiz Paulo KowalskiDepartamento de Cirurgia de Cabeca e Pescoco e Otorrinolaringologia, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-156X
Max Moura de OliveiraGrupo de Epidemiologia e Estatistica em Cancer, Centro Internacional de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-5145
Rossana Veronica Mendoza LopezGrupo de Epidemiologia e Estatistica em Cancer, Centro Internacional de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-767X
Diego Rodrigues Mendonça E SilvaGrupo de Epidemiologia e Estatistica em Cancer, Centro Internacional de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-8469-8415
Mauro Kazuo IkedaDepartamento de Cirurgia de Cabeca e Pescoco e Otorrinolaringologia, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4807-8192
Maria Paula CuradoGrupo de Epidemiologia e Estatistica em Cancer, Centro Internacional de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-2483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to estimate the overall survival (OS) and conditional survival (CS) in patients diagnosed with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to determine their survival trends.

methodsThe study included all consecutive patients treated at the A.C. Camargo Cancer Center for oral or oropharyngeal SCC between 2001 and 2012. Data were obtained from the Hospital Cancer Registry. OS and CS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method to evaluate the probability of survival with Cox predictor models.

resultsData of 505 oral and 380 oropharyngeal SCC patients obtained in 2001-2006 and 2007-2012 were analyzed. Most of the oral SCC (59%) and oropharyngeal SCC (90%) patients had stages III-IV SCC. The 5-year OS for patients with oral SCC was 51.7%, with no significant difference between the first and second periods. The CS rates in 2007-2012 were 65% after the first year and 86% up to the fifth year. For oropharyngeal SCC, the 5-year OS rate was 45.0% in the first period. The survival rate increased to 49.1% from 2007 to 2012, with a reduction in the risk of death (HR=0.69;0.52-09.2). The CS estimates from 2007 to 2012 were 59% after the first year and 75% up to the fifth year.

conclusionSurvival across the two time periods remained stable for oral SCC but showed a significant increase for oropharyngeal SCC, possibly because of improvements in the patients' response to radiotherapy, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and the use of more accurate diagnostic imaging approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32294669
PMCPMC7134554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.