Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32294192›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

Integrating image caption information into biomedical document classification in support of biocuration.

Xiangying Jiang, Pengyuan Li, James Kadin, Judith A Blake, Martin Ringwald, Hagit Shatkay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiangying JiangThe Computational Biomedicine and Machine Learning Lab, Department of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Pengyuan LiThe Computational Biomedicine and Machine Learning Lab, Department of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
James KadinThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Judith A BlakeThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Martin RingwaldThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Hagit ShatkayThe Computational Biomedicine and Machine Learning Lab, Department of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.

Funding

Mouse Genome DatabaseU41HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A, BULT, CAROL J · 2011 to 2020
$45.5M
Technical DevelopmentP41HD062499 · NICHD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MARTIN RINGWALD · 2011 to 2026
$37.3M
Clinical Importance of Drug-Drug InteractionsR01AG025152 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2006 to 2021
$8.1M
Uncovering Clinical Evidence in COVID-19 Publications: An Integrated Search via Text & ImagesR01LM012527 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI EIGENMANN, RUDOLF, MARAI, GEORGETA-ELISABETA · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Evidence-based Drug-Interaction Discovery: In-Vivo, In-Vitro and ClinicalR01LM011945 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LI, LANG, ROCHA, LUIS M · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000330NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025152NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD062499NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011945NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gathering information from the scientific literature is essential for biomedical research, as much knowledge is conveyed through publications. However, the large and rapidly increasing publication rate makes it impractical for researchers to quickly identify all and only those documents related to their interest. As such, automated biomedical document classification attracts much interest. Such classification is critical in the curation of biological databases, because biocurators must scan through a vast number of articles to identify pertinent information within documents most relevant to the database. This is a slow, labor-intensive process that can benefit from effective automation. We present a document classification scheme aiming to identify papers containing information relevant to a specific topic, among a large collection of articles, for supporting the biocuration classification task. Our framework is based on a meta-classification scheme we have introduced before; here we incorporate into it features gathered from figure captions, in addition to those obtained from titles and abstracts. We trained and tested our classifier over a large imbalanced dataset, originally curated by the Gene Expression Database (GXD). GXD collects all the gene expression information in the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) resource. As part of the MGI literature classification pipeline, GXD curators identify MGI-selected papers that are relevant for GXD. The dataset consists of ~60 000 documents (5469 labeled as relevant; 52 866 as irrelevant), gathered throughout 2012-2016, in which each document is represented by the text of its title, abstract and figure captions. Our classifier attains precision 0.698, recall 0.784, f-measure 0.738 and Matthews correlation coefficient 0.711, demonstrating that the proposed framework effectively addresses the high imbalance in the GXD classification task. Moreover, our classifier's performance is significantly improved by utilizing information from image captions compared to using titles and abstracts alone; this observation clearly demonstrates that image captions provide substantial information for supporting biomedical document classification and curation. Database URL.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAnimalsBiomedical ResearchComputational BiologyData CurationData MiningHumansInternet

Identifiers

PMID32294192
PMCPMC7159034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.