Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32294123›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Association between cigarette smoking and the risk of dysmenorrhea: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Lu-Lu Qin, Zhao Hu, Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga, Bang-An Luo, Hui-Lan Xu, Xiang-Lin Feng, Jia-He Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu-Lu QinDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7530-7395
Zhao HuDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Atipatsa Chiwanda KamingaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Mzuzu University, Luwinga, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Bang-An LuoDepartment of Mental Health, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hui-Lan XuDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiang-Lin FengDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Jia-He LiuDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNHunan Normal University · CNHunan Institute of Mental Health · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging studies have found inconsistent results on the potential relationship between cigarette smoking and dysmenorrhea. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantitatively synthesize the previous findings on the preceding relationship using meta-analysis.

methodsPrevious studies on the association between cigarette smoking and dysmenorrhea, published not later than November 2019, were systematically searched, using MeSH heading and/or relevant terms, in the electronic databases of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity, whose source was explored using subgroup analysis. A pooled effect size was obtained using random effects model, and sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the consistency of the pooled effect size.

resultsAfter a rigorous screening process, 24 studies involving 27,091 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that smokers were 1.45 times more likely to develop dysmenorrhea than non-smokers (odds ratio (OR) = 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.61). In addition, individuals classified as currently smoking were 1.50 times more likely to develop dysmenorrhea than those who were classified as never smoking (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.33-1.70), whereas being a former smoker was 1.31 times more likely to develop dysmenorrhea than being a never smoker (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.46). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the overall combined effect.

conclusionThe evidence from this meta-analysis indicated a significant association between cigarette smoking (both current and former smoking) and dysmenorrhea. The adverse effects of smoking provide further support for prevention of dysmenorrhea and emphasize the need to target women.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsiaChildCigarette SmokingDysmenorrheaEuropeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNorth AmericaObservational Studies as TopicOceaniaOdds RatioRisk FactorsSmokers

Identifiers

PMID32294123
PMCPMC7159229
OpenAlexW3016123566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.