Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293715›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of surgery2020

Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVIDSurg Collaborative

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06844227 (Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation -Virtual Visit), which is not on this map. Cited by 385 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
385citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06844227 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation -Virtual Visit (PAUSE-Virtual), a Simple Perioperative Anticoagulant Management Approach, Replacing a Resource-intensive In-person Doctor-patient Consultation, With a Simple Virtual Care Model That Will Provide a New Standard of Care for Patients on a Direct Oral Anticoagulant or Warfarin and Require Elective Surgery/Procedure.

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled1,780ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation (AF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

385 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review

325 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

COVIDSurg Collaborative

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgeons urgently need guidance on how to deliver surgical services safely and effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim was to identify the key domains that should be considered when developing pandemic preparedness plans for surgical services.

methodsA scoping search was conducted to identify published articles relating to management of surgical patients during pandemics. Key informant interviews were conducted with surgeons and anaesthetists with direct experience of working during infectious disease outbreaks, in order to identify key challenges and solutions to delivering effective surgical services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsThirteen articles were identified from the scoping search, and surgeons and anaesthetists representing 11 territories were interviewed. To mount an effective response to COVID-19, a pandemic response plan for surgical services should be developed in advance. Key domains that should be included are: provision of staff training (such as patient transfers, donning and doffing personal protection equipment, recognizing and managing COVID-19 infection); support for the overall hospital response to COVID-19 (reduction in non-urgent activities such as clinics, endoscopy, non-urgent elective surgery); establishment of a team-based approach for running emergency services; and recognition and management of COVID-19 infection in patients treated as an emergency and those who have had surgery. A backlog of procedures after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic is inevitable, and hospitals should plan how to address this effectively to ensure that patients having elective treatment have the best possible outcomes.

conclusionHospitals should prepare detailed context-specific pandemic preparedness plans addressing the identified domains. Specific guidance should be updated continuously to reflect emerging evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Guidelines as TopicSurgical Procedures, Operative

Identifiers

PMID32293715
PMCPMC7262310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.