ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Rule-Based Cohort Definitions for Acute Respiratory Failure: Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Electronic Phenotype Series for Measuring Adherence to the Wake Up and Breathe Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients.Research square · 2026Article
- SHREC: A framework for advancing next-generation computational phenotyping with large language models.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- SHREC: A Framework for Advancing Next-Generation Computational Phenotyping with Large Language Models.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Lightweight Language Models are Prone to Reasoning Errors for Complex Computational Phenotyping Tasks.ArXiv · 2025Article
- How do Clinicians Use Electronic Health Records for Respiratory Support Decisions? A Qualitative Study in Critical Care.ACI open · 2025Article
- Derivation and validation of generalized sepsis-induced acute respiratory failure phenotypes among critically ill patients: a retrospective study.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Derivation and Validation of Generalized Sepsis-induced Acute Respiratory Failure Phenotypes Among Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study.Research square · 2024Article
- Acute Respiratory Failure From Early Pandemic COVID-19: Noninvasive Respiratory Support vs Mechanical Ventilation.CHEST critical care · 2024Article
- "Electronic Phenotyping" Antimicrobials to Facilitate Outpatient Stewardship for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Noninvasive vs invasive respiratory support for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.PloS one · 2024Observational
- PHEONA: An Evaluation Framework for Large Language Model-based Approaches to Computational Phenotyping.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Trends and opportunities in computable clinical phenotyping: A scoping review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Predicting Failure of Noninvasive Respiratory Support Using Deep Recurrent Learning.Respiratory care · 2023Observational
- Validation of an Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm for Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- ARDS in COVID-19 and beyond: Let's keep our eyes on the goal instead of the straw man.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory failure is generally treated with invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive respiratory support strategies. The efficacies of the various strategies are not fully understood. There is a need for accurate therapy-based phenotyping for secondary analyses of electronic health record data to answer research questions regarding respiratory management and outcomes with each strategy.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to address knowledge gaps related to ventilation therapy strategies across diverse patient populations by developing an algorithm for accurate identification of patients with acute respiratory failure. To accomplish this objective, our goal was to develop rule-based computable phenotypes for patients with acute respiratory failure using remotely monitored intensive care unit (tele-ICU) data. This approach permits analyses by ventilation strategy across broad patient populations of interest with the ability to sub-phenotype as research questions require.
methodsTele-ICU data from ≥200 hospitals were used to create a rule-based algorithm for phenotyping patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as an adult patient requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or a noninvasive strategy. The dataset spans a wide range of hospitals and ICU types across all US regions. Structured clinical data, including ventilation therapy start and stop times, medication records, and nurse and respiratory therapy charts, were used to define clinical phenotypes. All adult patients of any diagnoses with record of ventilation therapy were included. Patients were categorized by ventilation type, and analysis of event sequences using record timestamps defined each phenotype. Manual validation was performed on 5% of patients in each phenotype.
resultsWe developed 7 phenotypes: (0) invasive mechanical ventilation, (1) noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, (2) high-flow nasal insufflation, (3) noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation subsequently requiring intubation, (4) high-flow nasal insufflation subsequently requiring intubation, (5) invasive mechanical ventilation with extubation to noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, and (6) invasive mechanical ventilation with extubation to high-flow nasal insufflation. A total of 27,734 patients met our phenotype criteria and were categorized into these ventilation subgroups. Manual validation of a random selection of 5% of records from each phenotype resulted in a total accuracy of 88% and a precision and recall of 0.8789 and 0.8785, respectively, across all phenotypes. Individual phenotype validation showed that the algorithm categorizes patients particularly well but has challenges with patients that require ≥2 management strategies.
conclusionsOur proposed computable phenotyping algorithm for patients with acute respiratory failure effectively identifies patients for therapy-focused research regardless of admission diagnosis or comorbidities and allows for management strategy comparisons across populations of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.