Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293573›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Patient Perceptions of Video Visits Using Veterans Affairs Telehealth Tablets: Survey Study.

Cindie Slightam, Amy J Gregory, Jiaqi Hu, Josephine Jacobs, Tolessa Gurmessa, Rachel Kimerling, Daniel Blonigen, Donna M Zulman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Developing a Patient Experience Questionnaire for the Man Van Mobile Clinical Unit.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Feasibility of Remote Administration of the Uniform Data Set-Version 3 for Assessment of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cindie SlightamCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9211-2285
Amy J GregoryCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0430-2973
Jiaqi HuCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-4755
Josephine JacobsCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0366-2985
Tolessa GurmessaCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-9426
Rachel KimerlingCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-4212
Daniel BlonigenCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3420-6704
Donna M ZulmanCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-2810
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Development of a Patient-Reported Measure to Assess Healthcare EngagementI01HX002317 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI KIMERLING, RACHEL · 2018 to 2023
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo-based health care can help address access gaps for patients and is rapidly being offered by health care organizations. However, patients who lack access to technology may be left behind in these initiatives. In 2016, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began distributing video-enabled tablets to provide video visits to veterans with health care access barriers.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate veterans' experiences with VA-issued tablets and identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for video visits vs in-person care.

methodsA baseline survey was sent to the tablet recipients, and a follow-up survey was sent to the respondents 3 to 6 months later. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for care, and we examined qualitative themes around care preferences using standard content analysis methods for coding the data collected in the open-ended questions.

resultsPatient-reported access barriers centered around transportation and health-related challenges, outside commitments, and feeling uncomfortable or uneasy at the VA. Satisfaction with the tablet program was high, and in the follow-up survey, approximately two-thirds of tablet recipients preferred care via a tablet (194/604, 32.1%) or expressed that video-based and in-person care were "about the same" (216/604, 35.7%), whereas one-third (192/604, 31.7%) indicated a preference for in-person care. Patients were significantly more likely to report a preference for video visits (vs a preference for in-person visits or rating them "about the same") if they felt uncomfortable in a VA setting, reported a collaborative communication style with their doctor, had a substance use disorder diagnosis, or lived in a place with better broadband coverage. Patients were less likely to report a preference for video visits if they had more chronic conditions. Qualitative analyses identified four themes related to preferences for video-based care: perceived improvements in access to care, perceived differential quality of care, feasibility of obtaining necessary care, and technology-related challenges.

conclusionsMany recipients of VA-issued tablets report that video care is equivalent to or preferred to in-person care. Results may inform efforts to identify good candidates for virtual care and interventions to support individuals who experience technical challenges.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTabletsTelemedicineUnited StatesVeteransVideotape RecordingTabletseHealthtelehealthtelemedicineveterans

Identifiers

PMID32293573
PMCPMC7191342
OpenAlexW3015568800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.