ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Patient Perceptions of Video Visits Using Veterans Affairs Telehealth Tablets: Survey Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translating Value Across Telehealth Stakeholders: A Rapid Review of Telehealth Measurement Evidence and a New Policy Framework to Guide Telehealth Researchers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Pooled it
- Application and implementation of telehealth services designed for the elderly population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Health informatics journalPooled it
- Video-Enhanced Care Management for Medically Complex Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Trial
- Goal Setting During Telerehabilitation in Japan: Qualitative Study of Occupational Therapists' and Physical Therapists' Experiences Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- The telehealth engagement measure: a proportions-based measure of care delivered via video and phone for research, clinical, and policy assessments.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Tablets and telehealth: expanding care reach by closing the digital divide.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Observational
- Willingness for video visits for non-emergent health issues, mental health, or specialty visits.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Emergency Department Utilization by Veterans for Low-Acuity Conditions After Virtual Care Expansion.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on AI- and XR-Enabled Telemedicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Breast Surgeons' Perspectives of Telehealth Visits for Breast Clinic.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Developing a Patient Experience Questionnaire for the Man Van Mobile Clinical Unit.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Determining the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized telehealth pilot study for veterans with chronic multisymptom illness.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Variability in Primary Care Telehealth Delivery Methods Across Chronic Conditions.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Examining veterans' preferences for how to deliver couples-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: Home-based telehealth or in-person?Psychological services · 2025Article
- Transtheoretical Model Technology-based Interventions to Improve Health Behaviors in Veterans.Motivation science · 2025Article
- Telehealth for Goals of Care Conversations in Advanced CKD: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study of US Veterans and Their Clinicians.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's Digital Divide Consult for Tablet Distribution and Telehealth Adoption: Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Remote Administration of the Uniform Data Set-Version 3 for Assessment of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024Article
- A Proposed Decision-Making Framework for the Translation of In-Person Clinical Care to Digital Care: Tutorial.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVideo-based health care can help address access gaps for patients and is rapidly being offered by health care organizations. However, patients who lack access to technology may be left behind in these initiatives. In 2016, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began distributing video-enabled tablets to provide video visits to veterans with health care access barriers.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate veterans' experiences with VA-issued tablets and identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for video visits vs in-person care.
methodsA baseline survey was sent to the tablet recipients, and a follow-up survey was sent to the respondents 3 to 6 months later. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for care, and we examined qualitative themes around care preferences using standard content analysis methods for coding the data collected in the open-ended questions.
resultsPatient-reported access barriers centered around transportation and health-related challenges, outside commitments, and feeling uncomfortable or uneasy at the VA. Satisfaction with the tablet program was high, and in the follow-up survey, approximately two-thirds of tablet recipients preferred care via a tablet (194/604, 32.1%) or expressed that video-based and in-person care were "about the same" (216/604, 35.7%), whereas one-third (192/604, 31.7%) indicated a preference for in-person care. Patients were significantly more likely to report a preference for video visits (vs a preference for in-person visits or rating them "about the same") if they felt uncomfortable in a VA setting, reported a collaborative communication style with their doctor, had a substance use disorder diagnosis, or lived in a place with better broadband coverage. Patients were less likely to report a preference for video visits if they had more chronic conditions. Qualitative analyses identified four themes related to preferences for video-based care: perceived improvements in access to care, perceived differential quality of care, feasibility of obtaining necessary care, and technology-related challenges.
conclusionsMany recipients of VA-issued tablets report that video care is equivalent to or preferred to in-person care. Results may inform efforts to identify good candidates for virtual care and interventions to support individuals who experience technical challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.