Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293524›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Leishmania infantum and Dirofilaria immitis infections in Italy, 2009-2019: changing distribution patterns.

Jairo Mendoza-Roldan, Giovanni Benelli, Rossella Panarese, Roberta Iatta, Tommaso Furlanello, Frederic Beugnet, Andrea Zatelli, Domenico Otranto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Design of Hybrid Quinoline-Chalcone Compounds AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current Enzooticity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jairo Mendoza-RoldanDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giovanni BenelliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Rossella PanareseDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Roberta IattaDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Tommaso FurlanelloSan Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Veggiano, Padova, Italy.
Frederic BeugnetBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Lyon, France.
Andrea ZatelliDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Domenico OtrantoDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy. domenico.otranto@uniba.it.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITBoehringer Ingelheim (France) · FRBu-Ali Sina University · IRUniversity of Pisa · ITVeterinary Oncological Center · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor long time, canine leishmaniosis (CanL) was considered endemic in the southern, central, and insular regions of Italy, whereas heartworm disease (HW) caused by Dirofilaria immitis was considered endemic in the northern region and in the swampy Po Valley. Following the reports of new foci of both diseases, in this study we update the distribution patterns and occurrence of new foci of CanL and HW discussing the main drivers for the changes in the epidemiology of these two important zoonotic canine vector-borne diseases.

methodsBased on the statistical analyses of serological assays (n = 90,633) on L. infantum exposure and D. immitis infection performed by two reference diagnostic centres in Italy over a ten-year period (2009-2019) irrespective of the anamnesis of dogs. The distribution patterns of both parasites are herein presented along with the occurrence of new foci.

resultsResults highlighted the changing distribution patterns of L. infantum vs D. immitis infection in Italy. CanL is endemic in some areas of northern regions and HW has endemic foci in central and southern regions and islands. Significant differences in L. infantum exposure and HW infection prevalence among the study macroareas were detected. The overall results of the positive tested samples were 28.2% in southern Italy and islands, 29.6% in central Italy and 21.6% in northern Italy for L. infantum and 2.83% in northern Italy, 7.75% in central Italy and 4.97% in southern Italy and islands for HW. HW positivity significantly varied over years (χ

conclusionsNew potential epidemiological scenarios are discussed according to a range of factors (e.g. environmental modifications, occurrence of competent insect vectors, transportation of infected animals to non-endemic areas, chemoprophylaxis or vector preventative measures), which may affect the current distribution. Overall, the results advocate for epidemiological surveillance programmes, more focussed preventative and control measures even in areas where few or no cases of both diseases have been diagnosed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsInsect VectorsItalyLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasisPsychodidaeSerologic TestsZoonosesAedes mosquitoesCanine vector-borne diseasesDirofilaria immitisLeishmania infantumSandflies

Identifiers

PMID32293524
PMCPMC7161282
OpenAlexW3015911297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.